The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High School Students’ Use of Electronic Cigarettes to Vaporize Cannabis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is increasing rapidly among high school (HS) students. Of concern, e-cigarettes can be used to vaporize cannabis, although use rates among adolescents are unknown. We evaluated lifetime rates of using e-cigarettes to vaporize cannabis among all lifetime e-cigarette users (27.9%), all lifetime cannabis users (29.2%), and lifetime users of both e-cigarettes and cannabis (18.8%); common means of vaporizing cannabis including hash oil, wax infused with Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and dried cannabis; and demographic predictors of using e-cigarettes to vaporize cannabis. METHODS: In the spring of 2014, 3847 Connecticut HS students completed an anonymous survey assessing e-cigarette and cannabis use. RESULTS: Vaporizing cannabis using e-cigarettes was common among lifetime e-cigarette users, lifetime cannabis users, and lifetime dual users (e-cigarette 18.0%, cannabis 18.4%, dual users 26.5%). Students reported using e-cigarettes to vaporize hash oil (e-cigarette 15.4%, cannabis 15.5%, dual users 22.9%) and wax infused with THC (e-cigarette 10.0%, cannabis 10.2%, dual users 14.8%) and using portable electronic vaporizers to vaporize dried cannabis leaves (e-cigarette 19.6%, lifetime cannabis 23.1%, lifetime dual users 29.1%). Binary logistic regression indicated that male students (odds ratio [OR] = 2.05), younger students (OR = 0.64), lifetime e-cigarette users (OR = 5.27), and lifetime cannabis users (OR = 40.89) were most likely to vaporize cannabis using e-cigarettes. Rates also differed by HS attended. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of vaporizing cannabis using e-cigarettes were high. These findings raise concerns about the lack of e-cigarette regulations and the potential use of e-cigarettes for purposes other than vaping nicotine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mehmedic, Z., Chandra, S., Slade, D., Denham, H., Foster, S., Patel, A. S., Ross, S. A., Khan, I. A., & ElSohly, M. A. (2010) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01441.x · Cited by 475
Cited by
Lim, C. C. W., Sun, T., Leung, J., Chung, J. Y. C., Gartner, C., Connor, J., Hall, W., Chiu, V., Stjepanović, D., & Chan, G. C. K. (2022) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4102 · Cited by 107
Wang, X., Lee, N. L., & Burstyn, I. (2020) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106041 · Cited by 86
Lozano, P., Barrientos-Gutierrez, I., Arillo-Santillan, E., Morello, P., Mejia, R., Sargent, J. D., & Thrasher, J. F. (2017) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.001 · Cited by 85
Self-Reported Use of Tobacco, E-cigarettes, and Marijuana Versus Urinary Biomarkers
Boykan, R., Messina, C. R., Chateau, G., Eliscu, A., Tolentino, J., & Goniewicz, M. L. (2019) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3531 · Cited by 79
Wang, X., Lee, N. L., & Burstyn, I. (2022) · Global Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100079 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Morean, M. E., Kong, G., Camenga, D. R., Cavallo, D. A., & Krishnan-Sarin, S.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2015-10-01
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 611-616
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2163997545
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High School Students’ Use of Electronic Cigarettes to Vaporize Cannabis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2015-1727
- The paper
- Morean, M. E., Kong, G., Camenga, D. R., Cavallo, D. A., & Krishnan-Sarin, S. (2015). High School Students’ Use of Electronic Cigarettes to Vaporize Cannabis. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1727
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.