Cited by 61Adolescent and Pediatric HealthcareChronic Disease Management StrategiesChild and Adolescent Health

Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Case Management Service for Children With Medical Complexity

Simon, Tamara D., Whitlock, Kathryn B., Haaland, Wren, Wright, Davene R., Zhou, Chuan, Neff, John, Howard, Waylon, Cartin, Brian +1 more·2017·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether children with medical complexity (CMC) exposed to a hospital-based comprehensive case management service (CCMS) experience improved health care quality, improved functional status, reduced hospital-based utilization, and/or reduced overall health care costs. METHODS: Eligible CMC at Seattle Children’s Hospital were enrolled in a cluster randomized controlled trial between December 1, 2010, and September 29, 2014. Participating primary care providers (PCPs) were randomly assigned, and CMC either had access to an outpatient hospital-based CCMS or usual care directed by their PCP. The CCMS included visits to a multidisciplinary clinic ≥ every 6 months for 1.5 years, an individualized shared care plan, and access to CCMS providers. Differences between control and intervention groups in change from baseline to 12 months and baseline to 18 months (difference of differences) were tested. RESULTS: Two hundred PCPs caring for 331 CMC were randomly assigned. Intervention group (n = 181) parents reported more improvement in the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems version 4.0 Child Health Plan Survey global health care quality ratings than control group parents (6.7 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.5–9.8] vs 1.3 [95% CI: 1.9–4.6] at 12 months). We did not detect significant differences in child functional status and most hospital-based utilization between groups. The difference in change of overall health care costs was higher in the intervention group (+$8233 [95% CI: $1701–$16 937]) at 18 months). CCMS clinic costs averaged $3847 per child-year. CONCLUSIONS: Access to a CCMS generally improved health care quality, but was not associated with changes in child functional status or hospital-based utilization, and increased overall health care costs among CMC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2017-1641

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, T. D., Whitlock, K. B., Haaland, W., Wright, D. R., Zhou, C., Neff, J., Howard, W., Cartin, B., & Mangione-Smith, R.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Simon, Tamara D.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2017-12-01
Volume
140
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2773310038
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
Keywords
children with medical complexity, quality of care, functional status, hospital utilization, health care costs, multidisciplinary clinic, shared care plans, primary care
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Case Management, Health Care Surveys, Quality Improvement, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review