Cited by 18Infant Development and Preterm CareMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Home Visiting for NICU Graduates: Impacts of Following Baby Back Home

Abstract

Background and objectives The Following Baby Back Home (FBBH) home visiting program supports families of high-risk low birth weight preterm infants after discharge from a hospital NICU. This study compares the health care use, immunization, and infant mortality rate of low birth weight preterm infants enrolled in FBBH with similar infants not in the program. Methods From January 2013 to December 2017, 498 children enrolled in FBBH were identified in Arkansas vital statistics records and the Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database. Infants in FBBH were matched with children in a control group on the basis of demographics and medical conditions of the infant. Generalized linear mixed models with double propensity-score adjustment were used to estimate program effects. Results In the first year after discharge and compared with a propensity-score matched cohort of control infants, those enrolled in FBBH were significantly more likely to have higher numbers of medical appointments and more compliant immunization history. The odds of dying in the first year of life for control infants was 4.4 times (95% confidence interval: 1.2-20.7) higher than those managed in the program. Conclusions A goal of the FBBH home visiting program is to work with parents to educate and support them as they care for their medically fragile infants. We conclude that education and support was instrumental in the infant health care use and outcome differences we observed during the first year of life.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2020-029397

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Callaghan, 2006, The contribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States, Pediatrics, 118, 1566, 10.1542/peds.2006-0860 · DOI
  2. Pridham, 2006, Guiding mothers’ management of health problems of very low birth-weight infants, Public Health Nurs, 23, 205, 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.230302.x · DOI
  3. Ramey, 1992, Infant Health and Development Program for low birth weight, premature infants: program elements, family participation, and child intelligence, Pediatrics, 89, 454, 10.1542/peds.89.3.454 · DOI
  4. Gottwald, 1990, Parent-infant interaction in neonatal intensive care units: Implications for research and service delivery, Infants Young Child, 2, 1, 10.1097/00001163-199001000-00003 · DOI
  5. Miceli, 2000, Brief report: birth status, medical complications, and social environment: individual differences in development of preterm, very low birth weight infants, J Pediatr Psychol, 25, 353, 10.1093/jpepsy/25.5.353 · DOI
  6. Treyvaud, 2009, Parenting behavior is associated with the early neurobehavioral development of very preterm children, Pediatrics, 123, 555, 10.1542/peds.2008-0477 · DOI
  7. Singer, 1999, Maternal psychological distress and parenting stress after the birth of a very low-birth-weight infant, JAMA, 281, 799, 10.1001/jama.281.9.799 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Habersaat, 2014, Posttraumatic stress symptoms and cortisol regulation in mothers of very preterm infants, Stress Health, 30, 134, 10.1002/smi.2503 · DOI
  9. Dudek-Shriber, 2004, Parent stress in the neonatal intensive care unit and the influence of parent and infant characteristics, Am J Occup Ther, 58, 509, 10.5014/ajot.58.5.509 · DOI
  10. Affleck, 1989, Effects of formal support on mothers’ adaptation to the hospital-to-home transition of high-risk infants: the benefits and costs of helping, Child Dev, 60, 488, 10.2307/1130993 · DOI
  11. Spencer-Smith, 2012, Long-term benefits of home-based preventive care for preterm infants: a randomized trial, Pediatrics, 130, 1094, 10.1542/peds.2012-0426 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Goyal, 2013, Home visiting and outcomes of preterm infants: a systematic review, Pediatrics, 132, 502, 10.1542/peds.2013-0077 · DOI
  13. Zhang, Early intervention for preterm infants and their mothers: a systematic review [published online ahead of print November 14, 2014], J Perinat Neonatal Nurs
  14. Meijssen, 2010, The effect of the Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program on mother-infant interaction after very preterm birth, J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 51, 1287, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02237.x · DOI
  15. Edraki, 2012, Effect of home visit on mortality and morbidity of preterm newborn, Arch Dis Child, 97, A523, 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1849 · DOI
  16. Liu, 2018, Transition Home Plus Program reduces Medicaid spending and health care use for high-risk infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for 5 or more days, J Pediatr, 200, 91, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.04.038 · DOI
  17. Vohr, 2018, Effects of a transition home program on preterm infant emergency room visits within 90 days of discharge, J Perinatol, 38, 185, 10.1038/jp.2017.136 · DOI
  18. Finello, 1998, Very low birth weight infants and their families during the first year of life: comparisons of medical outcomes based on after care services, J Perinatol, 18, 365
  19. Goyal, 2015, Effects of home visiting and maternal mental health on use of the emergency department among late preterm infants, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 44, 135, 10.1111/1552-6909.12538 · DOI
  20. Ahn, 2004, The effects of the systemic follow up health care program on the health promotion and the risk reduction in premature infants and their mothers [in Korean], Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi, 34, 1129
  21. Council on Community Pediatrics, 2009, The role of preschool home-visiting programs in improving children’s developmental and health outcomes, Pediatrics, 123, 598, 10.1542/peds.2008-3607 · DOI
  22. Olds, 2014, Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses on children: follow-up of a randomized trial at ages 6 and 9 years, JAMA Pediatr, 168, 114, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3817 · DOI
  23. Meghea, 2015, Statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care programs and infant mortality, Pediatrics, 136, 334, 10.1542/peds.2015-0479 · DOI
  24. Olds, 2014, Effect of home visiting by nurses on maternal and child mortality: results of a 2-decade follow-up of a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Pediatr, 168, 800, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.472 · DOI
  25. Donovan, 2007, Intensive home visiting is associated with decreased risk of infant death, Pediatrics, 119, 1145, 10.1542/peds.2006-2411 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Meghea, 2015, A statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal and postnatal care program and infant injuries, Matern Child Health J, 19, 2119, 10.1007/s10995-015-1724-z · DOI
  27. Harris, 2009, Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support, J Biomed Inform, 42, 377, 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
  28. D’Agostino, 2005, Adjustment methods: propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group, 67
  29. SAS Institute, 2018, The PSMATCH procedure, 8094
  30. Austin, 2017, Double propensity-score adjustment: a solution to design bias or bias due to incomplete matching, Stat Methods Med Res, 26, 201, 10.1177/0962280214543508 · DOI
  31. Abadie, 2011, Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects, J Bus Econ Stat, 29, 1, 10.1198/jbes.2009.07333 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Efron, 1993, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Puhr, 2017, Firth’s logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?, Stat Med, 36, 2302, 10.1002/sim.7273 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Šinkovec, 2019, Bring more data!—a good advice? Removing separation in logistic regression by increasing sample size, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16, 4658, 10.3390/ijerph16234658 · DOI
  35. Elgmati, 2015, Penalised logistic regression and dynamic prediction for discrete-time recurrent event data, Lifetime Data Anal, 21, 542, 10.1007/s10985-015-9321-4 · DOI
  36. O’Mahony, 2013, Medical complexity and pediatric emergency department and inpatient utilization, Pediatrics, 131, e559, 10.1542/peds.2012-1455 · DOI
  37. Thorland, 2017, Status of breastfeeding and child immunization outcomes in clients of the nurse-family partnership, Matern Child Health J, 21, 439, 10.1007/s10995-016-2231-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
McKelvey, L. M., Lewis, K. N., Beavers, J., Casey, P. H., Irby, C., & Goudie, A.
Affiliations
  • aDepartments of Family and Preventive Medicine
  • bPediatrics, College of Medicine,
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
148
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W3164983191
Cited by
18
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
home visiting, preterm infants, low birth weight, NICU discharge, infant mortality, immunization, health care utilization, medically fragile infants, parental support
MeSH terms
Family, Female, Health Education, Home Care Services, Humans, Immunization, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Male, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review