Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN

SILVERMAN, WILLIAM A., LECEY, JEROLD F., BEARD, ALICE, BROWN, AUDREY K., CORNBLATH, MARVIN, GROSSMAN, MOSES, LITTLE, JOSEPH A., LUBCHENCO, LULA O., METCOFF, JACK, SCHAFFER, ALEXANDER J., SPECTOR, SAMUEL, GRUENWALD, PETER, MURTAGH, JUAN·1967·Pediatrics

Abstract

A WORKSHOP MEETING of the Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Consultants was held in Chicago on October 22, 1966, to consider standard terms for the classification of newborn infants with respect to duration of gestation, birth weight, and intra-uterine growth. INTRODUCTION Liveborn infants have usually been classified according to weight at birth because of the close association between ponderal size and the risk of death in the first hours and days of life. This simple classification has been useful in developing uniform national and international vital statistics and the data have been used to plan public health programs aimed at reducing the incidence and the high mortality of neonates who are small at birth. However, the classification based on weight alone and the international definition of prematurity (≤2,500 gm), which equated birth size and fetal age, have had the effect of obscuring medically important differences between likesize infants of dissimilar gestational ages. In view of the evidence indicating that many of the neonates included within the limits of the international definition are not born prematurely (<37 weeks), the Expert Committee on Maternal and Child Health of the World Health Organization recommended that the concept of "prematurity" in the definition should give way to that of "low birth weight." Although the primary axis of classification (birth weight) remained unchanged, the new recommendation emphasized the need to use terms which make a clear distinction between size at birth and duration of gestation. In the past few years careful appraisal of newborn infants has revealed a growing number of associations between specific disorders in the neonatal period (e.g., antenatal infections, hypoglycemia, chromosomal abnormalities, respiratory distress syndrome) and either gestational age or aberrant intra-uterine growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.39.6.935

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
SILVERMAN, W. A., LECEY, J. F., BEARD, A., BROWN, A. K., CORNBLATH, M., GROSSMAN, M., LITTLE, J. A., LUBCHENCO, L. O., METCOFF, J., SCHAFFER, A. J., SPECTOR, S., GRUENWALD, P., & MURTAGH, J.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
1967-06-01
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
935-939
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2307127042
Cited by
424
References
0
FWCI
28.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.39.6.935
The paper
SILVERMAN, W. A., LECEY, J. F., BEARD, A., BROWN, A. K., CORNBLATH, M., GROSSMAN, M., LITTLE, J. A., LUBCHENCO, L. O., METCOFF, J., SCHAFFER, A. J., SPECTOR, S., GRUENWALD, P., & MURTAGH, J. (1967). COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.39.6.935

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.