Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Commentary on Breast-Feeding and Infant Formulas, Including Proposed Standards for Formulas

Barness, Lewis A., Mauer, Alvin M., Holliday, Malcolm A., Anderson, Arnold S., Dallman, Peter R., Forbes, Gilbert B., Goldbloom, Richard B., Haworth, James C., Jesse, Mary Jane, Scriver, Charles R., Winick, Myron, Kline, O. L., Miller, Robert W., O'Brien, Donough·1976·Pediatrics

Abstract

This statement proposes recommendations toward increasing the practice of breast feeding. Specific recommendations made for standards of infant formulas as to calorie, protein, fat, vitamin, and mineral levels apply to both milk-based and milk-substitute infant formulas. Such formulas, when used in place of breast-feeding, must supply most or all of the nutrients infants require during the first weeks or months of life. The minimum levels of nutrients per 100 kcal recommended for formulas provide good growth and development in healthy, full-term infants; distinct hazards may be encountered at levels below these. However, no significant advantage is to be gained by providing levels in excess of these minima in normal infants. Recommendations for maximum levels are made only where quantities in excess lead to toxicity; generally, levels near the minima recommended are most desirable because they are the most likely to reflect the composition of human milk, and the least likely to result in any undesirable nutrient to nutrient interaction. The recommendations also can be used as reference standards for formulas for special dietary uses of "medical" formulas. The Committee recommends that "medical" formulas be classified by FDA into a special group under the paragraph dealing with infant formulas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.57.2.278

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Barness, L. A., Mauer, A. M., Holliday, M. A., Anderson, A. S., Dallman, P. R., Forbes, G. B., Goldbloom, R. B., Haworth, J. C., Jesse, M. J., Scriver, C. R., Winick, M., Kline, O. L., Miller, R. W., & O'Brien, D.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
1976-02-01
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
278-285
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1619524873
Cited by
348
References
0
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commentary on Breast-Feeding and Infant Formulas, Including Proposed Standards for Formulas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.57.2.278
The paper
Barness, L. A., Mauer, A. M., Holliday, M. A., Anderson, A. S., Dallman, P. R., Forbes, G. B., Goldbloom, R. B., Haworth, J. C., Jesse, M. J., Scriver, C. R., Winick, M., Kline, O. L., Miller, R. W., & O'Brien, D. (1976). Commentary on Breast-Feeding and Infant Formulas, Including Proposed Standards for Formulas. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.57.2.278

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.