The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physician Reimbursement by Salary or Fee-for-Service: Effect on Physician Practice Behavior in a Randomized Prospective Study
Abstract
We used a resident continuity clinic to compare prospectively the impact of salary v fee-for-service reimbursement on physician practice behavior. This model allowed randomization of physicians into salary and fee-for-service groups and separation of the effects of reimbursement from patient behavior. Physicians reimbursed by fee-for-services scheduled more visits per patient than did salaried physicians (3.69 visits v 2.83 visits, P < .01) and saw their patients more often (2.70 visits v 2.21 visits, P < .05) during the 9-month study. Almost all of this difference was because fee-for-service physicians saw more well patients than salaried physicians (1.42 visits and .99 visits per enrolled patient, respectively, P < .01). Evaluating visits by American Academy of Pediatrics' guidelines indicated that fee-for-service physicians saw more patients for well-childcare than salaried physicians because they missed fewer recommended ommended visits and scheduled visits in excess of those recommendations. Fee-for-service physicians also provided better continuity of care than salaried physicians by attending a larger percentage of all visits made by their patients (86.6% of visits v 78.3% of visits, P < .05), and by encouraging fewer emergency visits per enrolled patient (0.12 visits v 0.22 visits, P < .01). Physicians' interest in private practice, as determined by their career plans, correlated significantly with total number of patients enrolled (r = .48, P < .05) and total clinic patients seen by each resident during the study (r = .40, P < .05): reimbursement was not significantly related to these two outcomes after correction for differences in career plans by fee-for-service and salaried physicians. A resident continuity clinic was used as a model, and it was possible to isolate the effect of reimbursement from patient/parent behavior and to demonstrate that reimbursement method and physician interest in practice motivated physicians to influence the use of outpatient services by their patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gosden, T., Forland, F., Kristiansen, I., Sutton, M., Leese, B., Giuffrida, A., Sergison, M., & Pedersen, L. (2000) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002215 · Cited by 428
Flodgren, G., Eccles, M. P., Shepperd, S., Scott, A., Parmelli, E., & Beyer, F. R. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009255 · Cited by 418
CHAIX-COUTURIER, C., DURAND-ZALESKI, I., JOLLY, D., & DURIEUX, P. (2000) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/12.2.133 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Hickson, G. B., Altemeier, W. A., & Perrin, J. M.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1987-09-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 344-350
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1550562788
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physician Reimbursement by Salary or Fee-for-Service: Effect on Physician Practice Behavior in a Randomized Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.80.3.344
- The paper
- Hickson, G. B., Altemeier, W. A., & Perrin, J. M. (1987). Physician Reimbursement by Salary or Fee-for-Service: Effect on Physician Practice Behavior in a Randomized Prospective Study. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.80.3.344
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.