Stimulant Medication Use by Primary Care Physicians in the Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Abstract
Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), one of the most common behavioral disorders in children in the United States, remains controversial because of concern about stimulant medication use. Extending a previous study of pediatricians, the present study surveyed a random national sample of family practitioners and then directly screened 457 patients of 10 pediatricians and family practitioners in two small midwestern cities. Responses to the national survey indicated that stimulant medication remains the main treatment prescribed by primary care physicians for children with ADHD. In the direct patient screening, the prevalence of ADHD diagnoses was 5.3% (pediatricians) and 4.2% (family practitioners) of all elementary-schoolaged children screened. Eighty-eight percent of these children were treated with methyiphenidate. Although medication was considered an effective treatment by the parents of 85% of the children given the medication, efficacy was unrelated to the accuracy of diagnosis. When explicit DSM-III-R criteria were used, only 72% of those assigned a diagnosis of ADHD by the physicians would have received that diagnosis based on a structured psychiatric interview with the parents and only 53% received that diagnosis based on teacher report of symptoms, even when the child was not receiving medication. Although the majority of physicians (in both the surveys and the direct screenings) reported using at least some behavioral treatments with their patients, parents reported infrequent use of nonpharmacologic forms of therapy, such as behavior modification. These data thus indicate a relatively modest rate of stimulant medication use for ADHD, but a serious underuse of systematic behavioral treatments in primary care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies from the late 1980s/early 1990s suggested that some children and adolescents with ADHD and comorbid anxiety disorders were less responsive to stimulant treatment than children with ADHD alone for core ADHD symptoms.
“However, several studies from the late 1980s/early 1990s suggested that some children and adolescents with ADHD and comorbid anxiety disorders were less responsive to stimulant treatment than children with ADHD alone, for treatment of core AHDH symptoms [48, 49].”
From Using Stimulants to Treat ADHD-Related Emotional Lability (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Children with comorbid anxiety also had higher rates of side effects, including tics, although there was no evidence that stimulants worsened symptoms of either ADHD or anxiety.
“Children with comorbid anxiety also had higher rates of side effects, including tics, although there was no evidence that stimulants worsened symptoms of either ADHD or anxiety.”
From Using Stimulants to Treat ADHD-Related Emotional Lability (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 170
- Authors
- Wolraich, M. L., Lindgren, S., Stromquist, A., Milich, R., Davis, C., & Watson, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- ORCID
- Lindgren, Scott
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1990-07-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-101
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1491739464
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh040875-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH40875)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stimulant medication, methylphenidate, primary care physicians, family practitioners, pediatricians, ADHD diagnosis, behavior therapy, behavior modification, children, drug efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Drug Utilization, Humans, Methylphenidate, Parents, Physicians, Family, Primary Health Care, Psychotropic Drugs, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stimulation, Chemical, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review