The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breast-Feeding Rates Among Black Urban Low-Income Women: Effect of Prenatal Education
Abstract
Many factors are associated with low breast-feeding rates among black low-income women. This study examines whether, despite such factors, health professionals' prenatal education of black poor women is assoicated with increased breast-feeding rates. Black women born in the United States who attended a midwives prenatal clinic (N = 159) were randomly assigned to two types of prenatal education or were followed up in a control group. All women were interviewed on entry into the study and after delivery of their infants. Women assigned to group classes attended at least one session discussing myths, problems, and benefits of breast-feeding. Women assigned to individual prenatal counseling spoke with a pediatrician or nurse practitioner, who discussed breast-feeding topics similar to those covered in the classes. Women in the control group received no additional prenatal education. The three study groups had significantly different percentages of women who breast-fed (controls 22%, classes 46%, individual sessions 53%). Higher percentages of women in the study groups carried out their prenatal plans to breast-feed (controls 50%, classes 86%, individual sessions 62%) or breast-fed despite prenatal plans to bottle-feed (controls 10%, classes 26%, individual sessions 48%). After multivariable analysis controlling for age, prenatal pians to breast-feed, prior breast-feeding experience, perceived support for breast-feeding, education, gravidity, and employment plans, women in intervention groups had a higher likelihood of breast-feeding than control subjects. These findings suggest that an increase in relatively simple, not-too-time-consuming educational efforts in institutions and offices serving black low-income women might yield significant narrowing of the gap in breast-feeding rates between white affluent women and black low-income women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kramer, M. S., Chalmers, B., Hodnett, E. D., Sevkovskaya, Z., Dzikovich, I., Shapiro, S., Collet, J.-P., Vanilovich, I., Mezen, I., Ducruet, T., et al. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.4.413 · Cited by 1,534
Lay health workers in primary and community health care
Lewin, S., Dick, J., Pond, P., Zwarenstein, M., Aja, G. N., van Wyk, B. E., Bosch-Capblanch, X., & Patrick, M. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004015.pub2 · Cited by 544
Clinician Support and Psychosocial Risk Factors Associated With Breastfeeding Discontinuation
Taveras, E. M., Capra, A. M., Braveman, P. A., Jensvold, N. G., Escobar, G. J., & Lieu, T. A. (2003) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.112.1.108 · Cited by 503
Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding
Balogun, O. O., O'Sullivan, E. J., McFadden, A., Ota, E., Gavine, A., Garner, C. D., Renfrew, M. J., & MacGillivray, S. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001688.pub3 · Cited by 455
National Assessment of Physicians' Breast-feeding Knowledge, Attitudes, Training, and Experience
Freed, G. L. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520300046035 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Kistin, N., Benton, D., Rao, S., & Sullivan, M.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1990-11-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 741-746
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1941691838
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast-Feeding Rates Among Black Urban Low-Income Women: Effect of Prenatal Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.86.5.741
- The paper
- Kistin, N., Benton, D., Rao, S., & Sullivan, M. (1990). Breast-Feeding Rates Among Black Urban Low-Income Women: Effect of Prenatal Education. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.86.5.741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.