The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increasing Patient Knowledge, Satisfaction, and Involvement: Randomized Trial of a Communication Intervention
Abstract
A brief educational intervention to promote effective communication between physicians, children, and parents during pediatric office visits was designed and tested. A randomized clinical trial involving 141 children (5- to 15-year-olds) tested the effectiveness of the intervention to improve the process and outcome of medical care. The intervention was contained in three brief videotapes (one each for parents, physicians, and patients) and in accompanying written materials. Materials were designed to build skills and motivation for increased child competence and participation during pediatric medical visits. Control subjects saw health education videotapes and received materials comparable in length with those of experimental subjects. Postintervention medical visit process was analyzed using videotapes of visits. Visit outcomes, assessed with standardized instruments and interviews, included children's rapport with physicians, children's anxiety, children's preference for an active health role, children's recall of information, parents' satisfaction with the medical visit, and physician satisfaction. Results indicated that physicians in the intervention group, compared with their counterparts in the control group, more often included children in discussions of medical recommendations (50% vs 29%, t = 2.39, P less than .05); that children in the intervention group, compared with control children, recalled more medication recommendations (77% vs 47%, P less than .01) and reported greater satisfaction and preference for an active health role; and that the intervention and control groups did not differ in parent satisfaction, physician satisfaction, or child anxiety. The results suggest that a brief educational intervention administered during waiting room time can positively impact physician-child rapport and children's preference for an active role in health and their acquisition of medical information.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“data were analysed using mixed‐effects analysis of variance (BMDP 3V microcomputer statistical program). Parent gender and experimental status were include as fixed effects, and physician was included as a random effect.”
From Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations (2012) · cites this paper as Lewis 1991
In the citing paper
“Videotapes were coded by a research assistant blind to the study hypotheses and design”
From Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations (2012) · cites this paper as Lewis 1991
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations
Dwamena, F., Holmes-Rovner, M., Gaulden, C. M., Jorgenson, S., Sadigh, G., Sikorskii, A., Lewin, S., Smith, R. C., Coffey, J., Olomu, A., et al. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003267.pub2 · Cited by 1,227
Meta‐analysis of family‐centered helpgiving practices research
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. W. (2007) · Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/mrdd.20176 · Cited by 691
Griffin, S. J. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.142 · Cited by 578
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations
Lewin, S., Skea, Z., Entwistle, V. A., Zwarenstein, M., & Dick, J. (2001) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003267 · Cited by 530
Levetown, M., & and the Committee on Bioethics (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0565 · Cited by 496
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, C. C., Pantell, R. H., & Sharp, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Venue
- PEDIATRICS
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1991-08-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 351-358
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1876224639
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (5 R01 HS 05408-03)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Keywords
- physician-patient communication, pediatric office visits, patient education intervention, childhood anxiety, drug recall, patient satisfaction, parental satisfaction, physician satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Psychology, Child, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Office Visits, Parents, Patient Participation, Pediatrics, Physician-Patient Relations, Mental Recall
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review