The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Drug Screening of Newborns by Meconium Analysis: A Large-Scale, Prospective, Epidemiologic Study
Abstract
A large-scale, prospective drug screening of newborns by meconium analysis was done to determine more accurately the prevalence and epidemiologic characteristics of drug use in a high-risk urban, obstetric population. Every other neonate delivered in a perinatal center from November 1988 to September 1989 was prospectively enrolled and their meconium was analyzed by radioimmunoassay for the metabolites of three commonly abused drugs—cocaine, morphine (opiates), and cannabinoid. In 3010 subjects studied, 44% were positive for cocaine, morphine, or cannabinoid; 31% were positive for cocaine, 21% for morphine, and 12% for cannabinoid. In contrast, only 335 (11%) mothers admitted to illicit drug use: 52% of their newborns had a positive urine drug screen and 88% had a positive meconium drug screen. Prevalence of drug use among the pregnant women varied per month. A profile of the pregnant addict in the population studied was noted (P < .001): service patient, single, multigravid (>3), and little or no prenatal care. The major problems associated with drug use during pregnancy were principally noted in the group that was exposed to cocaine and opiates and in the group where the mothers admitted to the use of illicit drugs. On the other hand, a large number of neonates who have been exposed to drugs in utero, particularly those whose mothers denied the use of drugs, appear normal at birth and may not be recognized. Improved detection of these newborns at risk can be achieved with a high index of suspicion and meconium drug analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frank, D. A., Augustyn, M., Knight, W. G., Pell, T., & Zuckerman, B. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.12.1613 · Cited by 503
Addressing the Mental Health Needs of Pregnant and Parenting Adolescents
Hodgkinson, S., Beers, L., Southammakosane, C., & Lewin, A. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-0927 · Cited by 314
The Maternal Lifestyle Study: Drug Use by Meconium Toxicology and Maternal Self-Report
Lester, B. M., ElSohly, M., Wright, L. L., Smeriglio, V. L., Verter, J., Bauer, C. R., Shankaran, S., Bada, H. S., Walls, H. C., Huestis, M. A., et al. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.107.2.309 · Cited by 307
Rivkin, M. J., Davis, P. E., Lemaster, J. L., Cabral, H. J., Warfield, S. K., Mulkern, R. V., Robson, C. D., Rose-Jacobs, R., & Frank, D. A. (2008) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1399 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Ostrea, E. M., Brady, M., Gause, S., Raymundo, A. L., & Stevens, M.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-113
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1507469172
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug Screening of Newborns by Meconium Analysis: A Large-Scale, Prospective, Epidemiologic Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.89.1.107
- The paper
- Ostrea, E. M., Brady, M., Gause, S., Raymundo, A. L., & Stevens, M. (1992). Drug Screening of Newborns by Meconium Analysis: A Large-Scale, Prospective, Epidemiologic Study. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.89.1.107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.