The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Positioning and SIDS
Abstract
SUMMARY STATEMENT Based on careful evaluation of existing data indicating an association between Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and prone sleeping position for infants, the Academy recommends that healthy infants, when being put down for sleep, be positioned on their side or back. The most common position currently used in the United States is prone. This recommendation is made with the full recognition that the existing studies have methodologic limitations and were conducted in countries with infant care practices and other SIDS risk factors that differ from those in the United States (eg, maternal smoking, types of bedding, central heating, etc). However, taken as a group the studies are convincing. No reports show an advantage to the prone position with regard to SIDS incidence and there are no data proving, or even strongly suggesting, that sleeping in the lateral or supine position is harmful to healthy infants. Thus, assessment of the risk/benefit balance for prone vs nonprone positioning for such infants favors the latter. It should be stressed that, the actual risk of SIDS for an infant placed prone is still extremely low. There are still good reasons for placing certain infants prone. For premature infants with respiratory distress, for infants with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux or with certain upper airway anomalies, and perhaps for some others, prone may well be the position of choice. A nonprone sleeping position is recommended for healthy infants only. REPORT Health care professionals frequently are asked how it is best to place an infant down for sleep, prone or supine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Moon, R. Y., TASK FORCE ON SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME, Darnall, R. A., Feldman-Winter, L., Goodstein, M. H., & Hauck, F. R. (2016) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2940 · Cited by 583
Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1499 · Cited by 526
Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study
Luo, Z.-C. (2006) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.051096 · Cited by 382
Adolph, K. E., & Robinson, S. R. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy204 · Cited by 135
Sudden death in children and adolescents
Berger, S., Utech, L., & Fran Hazinski, M. (2004) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2004.07.004 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- AAP Task Force on Infant Positioning and SIDS
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1120-1126
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2143134616
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positioning and SIDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.89.6.1120
- The paper
- AAP Task Force on Infant Positioning and SIDS. (1992). Positioning and SIDS. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.89.6.1120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.