The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: A Therapy-Based Severity-of-Illness Index
Abstract
Severity-of-illness scales have proven valuable able in assessing clinical outcomes and resource consumption in adult and pediatric intensive care, but they have been less extensively developed for neonatal care. The National Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (NTISS) was created by modifying the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS). From the 76 original TISS items, 42 were deleted and 28 added to form the NTISS. Like TISS, NTISS assigns score points from 1 to 4 for various intensive care therapies. Admission-day NTISS scores were calculated for 1643 newborns admitted to three neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) between November 1, 1989, and September 30, 1990. NTISS scores ranged from 0 to 47 with a mean of 12.3 ± 8.7 (SD). There was little correlation with birth weight (r = -.11) or gestational age (r = -.17), but NTISS scores were highly correlated with expected markers of illness severity, including mortality risk estimates by neonatal attending physicians (r = .70, P < .0001), in-hospital mortality rates (P < .05), and a measure of nursing acuity (Medicus) (r = .05), and a measure of nursing acuity (Medicus) (r = .69, P < .0001). In addition, admission-day NTISS scores were found to be predictive of both NICU length of stay (r = .37, P < .0001) and total hospital charges for survivors (r = .65, P < .0001). It is concluded that NTISS is a valid measure of therapeutic intensity that is independent of birth weight and can be used as an indicator of neonatal illness severity and resource utilization. Further validation in other NICUs is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Early experience alters brain function and structure
Als, H., Duffy, F. H., McAnulty, G. B., Rivkin, M. J., Vajapeyam, S., Mulkern, R. V., Warfield, S. K., Huppi, P. S., Butler, S. C., Conneman, N., et al. (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.113.4.846 · Cited by 890
Variations in Practice and Outcomes in the Canadian NICU Network: 1996–1997
Lee, S. K., McMillan, D. D., Ohlsson, A., Pendray, M., Synnes, A., Whyte, R., Chien, L.-Y., Sale, J., & the Canadian NICU Network (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.106.5.1070 · Cited by 490
Thureen, P. J., Melara, D., Fennessey, P. V., & Hay, W. W. (2003) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/00006450-200301000-00008 · Cited by 349
ALS, H., GILKERSON, L., DUFFY, F. H., MCANULTY, G. B., BUEHLER, D. M., VANDENBERG, K., SWEET, N., SELL, E., PARAD, R. B., RINGER, S. A., et al. (2003) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/00004703-200312000-00001 · Cited by 344
Should central venous catheters be removed as soon as candidemia is detected in neonates
Karlowicz, M. G., Hashimoto, L. N., Kelly, R. E., & Buescher, E. S. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.106.5.e63 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Gray, J. E., Richardson, D. K., McCormick, M. C., Workman-Daniels, K., & Goldmann, D. A.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1992-10-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 561-567
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1486198143
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: A Therapy-Based Severity-of-Illness Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.90.4.561
- The paper
- Gray, J. E., Richardson, D. K., McCormick, M. C., Workman-Daniels, K., & Goldmann, D. A. (1992). Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: A Therapy-Based Severity-of-Illness Index. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.90.4.561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.