The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Growth of Breast-Fed Infants Deviates From Current Reference Data: A Pooled Analysis of US, Canadian, and European Data Sets
Abstract
The sample sizes of infants from the selected studies are shown in Tables 2-4, categorized by duration of breast-feeding, timing of introduction of solid foods, and use of infant formula or other milks. Table 5 shows the cross-tabulation by duration of breast-feeding and age of introduction of supplemental milk or formula. In total, 453 infants were included, of whom 226 were breast-fed for at least 12 months. Of these 226, 141 were not regularly given other milks or formula during the first year of life. Of the total sample, solid foods were introduced at 4 to 5 months to 42% (Table 3), at 6 to 7 months to 38%, at 8 to 9 months at 17%, and after 9 months to 2%. The samples were relatively homogeneous with respect to average maternal weight, height, and age. Mean pregnancy weight gain in the three studies reporting this ranged from 12.7 to 15.0 kg. Maternal educational levels were generally high: in the studies reporting this as a continuous variable, the overall mean was 15.4 ± 2.4 years of education. Mean birth weight ranged from 3414 to 3605 g. Characteristics of infants categorized by breast-feeding duration are shown in Table 6 (the group breast-fed for 4 to 5 month is not shown, because there were only 10 infants in this category). Mothers who breast-fed for 12 or more months were older and had higher parity and educational levels than mothers who breast-fed for less than 12 months, but birth weight did not differ significantly among groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Optimal Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review
Kramer, M. S., & Kakuma, R. (2004) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4242-8_7 · Cited by 987
Risk of Overweight Among Adolescents Who Were Breastfed as Infants
Gillman, M. W. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.19.2461 · Cited by 772
de Onis, M., & Onyango, A. W. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60131-2 · Cited by 573
Volume and Frequency of Breastfeedings and Fat Content of Breast Milk Throughout the Day
Kent, J. C., Mitoulas, L. R., Cregan, M. D., Ramsay, D. T., Doherty, D. A., & Hartmann, P. E. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1417 · Cited by 537
Kramer, M. S., Matush, L., Vanilovich, I., Platt, R. W., Bogdanovich, N., Sevkovskaya, Z., Dzikovich, I., Shishko, G., Collet, J.-P., Martin, R. M., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/86.5.1717 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Dewey, K. G., Peerson, J. M., Brown, K. H., Krebs, N. F., Michaelsen, K. F., Persson, L. A., Salmenpera, L., Whitehead, R. G., Yeung, D. L., & World Health Organization Working Group on Infant Growth
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 497-503
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1901203167
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth of Breast-Fed Infants Deviates From Current Reference Data: A Pooled Analysis of US, Canadian, and European Data Sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.96.3.497
- The paper
- Dewey, K. G., Peerson, J. M., Brown, K. H., Krebs, N. F., Michaelsen, K. F., Persson, L. A., Salmenpera, L., Whitehead, R. G., Yeung, D. L., & World Health Organization Working Group on Infant Growth. (1995). Growth of Breast-Fed Infants Deviates From Current Reference Data: A Pooled Analysis of US, Canadian, and European Data Sets. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.96.3.497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.