The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Early Discharge of Newborns and Mothers: A Critical Review of the Literature
Abstract
Objective. To determine whether research supports the advisability of early discharge of healthy newborns and mothers. Methods. Critical review of English-language literature cited in the Index Medicus or the International Nursing Index. Findings. No adequately designed studies have examined discharge before 48 hours after delivery without additional postdischarge services. Few studies have examined the consequences of recommending a clinic visit within the first days after discharge; studies of this practice among low-income populations found high no-show rates. Some small studies suggest that early discharge is likely to be safe for selected populations at low psychosocial, socioeconomic, and medical risk, with careful antenatal screening and preparation and multiple postpartum home visits. Some studies suggested adverse outcomes associated with early discharge even with early follow-up. Conclusions. Published research provides little knowledge of the consequences of short maternal/newborn hospital stays or varying postdischarge practices for the general population. The studies that have concluded that early discharge was safe were applied under restricted circumstances or were too small to detect clinically significant effects on important outcomes. Further research is needed to inform clinical and reimbursement policy on health services in the first days of life and parenting. Rigorous studies of sufficient size are needed to examine the impact of different hospital stays and different postdischarge practices on a range of outcomes for mothers and newborns in diverse populations and settings. Given a priori concerns, decisions on neonatal/obstetric discharge planning should be made cautiously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bhutani, V. K., Johnson, L., & Sivieri, E. M. (1999) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.103.1.6 · Cited by 894
Bhutani, V. K., Gourley, G. R., Adler, S., Kreamer, B., Dalin, C., & Johnson, L. H. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.106.2.e17 · Cited by 417
Early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants
Brown, S., Small, R., Argus, B., Davis, P. G., & Krastev, A. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002958 · Cited by 253
Escobar, G. J., Braveman, P. A., Ackerson, L., Odouli, R., Coleman-Phox, K., Capra, A. M., Wong, C., & Lieu, T. A. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.108.3.719 · Cited by 149
Self-citationEarly postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants
Jones, E., Stewart, F., Taylor, B., Davis, P. G., & Brown, S. J. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002958.pub2 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Braveman, P., Egerter, S., Pearl, M., Marchi, K., & Miller, C.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1995-10-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 716-726
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W4319290946
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Discharge of Newborns and Mothers: A Critical Review of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.96.4.716
- The paper
- Braveman, P., Egerter, S., Pearl, M., Marchi, K., & Miller, C. (1995). Early Discharge of Newborns and Mothers: A Critical Review of the Literature. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.96.4.716
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.