The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Routine Emergency Department Use for Sick Care by Children in the United States
Abstract
Background. The use of the emergency departments as a regular source of sick care has been increasing, despite the fact that it is costly and is often an inappropriate source of care. This study examines factors associated with routine use of emergency departments by using a national sample of US children. Methods. Data from the 1988 National Health Interview Survey on Child Health, a nationally representative sample of 17 710 children younger than 18 years, was linked to county-level health resource data from the Area Resource File. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the association between children's use of emergency departments as their usual sources of sick care and predisposing need and enabling characteristics of the families, as well as availability of health resources in their communities. Results. In 1988 3.4% or approximately 2 million US children younger than 18 years were reported to use emergency departments as their usual sources of sick care. Significant demographic risk factors for reporting an emergency department as a usual source of sick care included black versus white race (odds ratio [OR], 2.08), single-parent versus two-parent families (OR, 1.53), mothers with less than a high school education versus those with high school or more (OR, 1.76), poor versus nonpoor families (OR, 1.76), and living in an urban versus suburban setting (OR, 1.38). Specific indicators of need, such as recurrent health conditions (asthma, tonsillitis, headaches, and febrile seizures), were not associated with routine use of emergency departments for sick care. Furthermore, health insurance status and specifically Medicaid coverage had no association with use of the emergency department as a usual source of sick care. Compared with children who receive well child care in private physicians' offices or health maintenance organizations, children whose sources of well child care were neighborhood health centers were more likely to report emergency departments for sick care (OR, 2.01). Children residing in counties where the supply of primary care physicians was in the top quintile had half the odds (OR, 0.50) of reporting emergency departments as usual sources of sick care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adolescents Who Use the Emergency Department as Their Usual Source of Care
Wilson, K. M., & Klein, J. D. (2000) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.154.4.361 · Cited by 281
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care for Adolescents: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Elster, A., Jarosik, J., VanGeest, J., & Fleming, M. (2003) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.9.867 · Cited by 279
Family income gradients in the health and health care access of US children.
Larson, K., & Halfon, N. (2010) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-009-0477-y · Cited by 187
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Halfon, N., Newacheck, P. W., Wood, D. L., & St Peter, R. F.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1996-07-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-34
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1579747988
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Routine Emergency Department Use for Sick Care by Children in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.98.1.28
- The paper
- Halfon, N., Newacheck, P. W., Wood, D. L., & St Peter, R. F. (1996). Routine Emergency Department Use for Sick Care by Children in the United States. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.98.1.28
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.