Toxicity of imidacloprid for nontarget arthropods in a laboratory experiment
Open accessAbstract
The use of systemic neonicotinoid insecticides disrupts the ecological balance in agrocenoses and is detrimental to no n target invertebrates. Therefore, in a laboratory experiment, we evaluated the sensitivity of 50 nontarget species of invert e brates to imidacloprid. No sensitivity to this insecticide was shown by Cylindroiulus truncorum , Formica rufa , Geophilus carpophagus , and Pterostichus niger (the LС 50 values were in the range of 10 to 166 mg/m 2 ). A moderate sensitivity was exhibited by Lithobius forficatus , Megaphyllum sp., Forficula auricularia , Labia minor , Porcellio laevis , Notiophilus pal u stris , Harpalus rufipes , H. latus , Amara nitida , Ophonus rufibarbis , Ponera coarctata , Lasius fuliginosus , L. niger , L. flavus , Rhyparochromus phoeniceus , Lygus pratensis , Oxythyrea funesta , and Teuchestes fossor (LС 50 measuring 1 to 10 mg/m 2 ). Imidacloprid-sensitive species were found to be Carabus convexus , C. granulatus , C. hortensis , Nebria brevicollis , Tach y porus hypnorum , Tachinus signatus , Drusilla canaliculata , Philonthus coprophilus , Ph. decorus , Ph. niti dus , Ph. cognatus , Silpha carinata , Phosphuga atrata , Aphodius foetens , Hister fenestus , Chortippus sp., Graphosoma itali cum , Coreus marg i natus , Pyrrhocoris apterus , and Myrmica ruginodis (LС 50 ranging 0.1 to 1 mg/m 2 ). A hypersensitivity to the studied insect i cide was registered for Ph. carbonarius , Xantholinus tricolor , and Oxytelus sculptus (LС 50 accounting for 0.03 to 0.08 mg/m 2 ). The values of median lethal concentration for some nontarget arthropods could vary by over 5 ,000 times. We o b served no relationship between trophic specialization of the species and sensitivity to imidacloprid. The larger the invert e brate’s body, the less sensitivity to the insecticide it exhibited.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Saeed, R., Razaq, M., & Hardy, I. C. (2016) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4146 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Faly, L. I., Orzekauskaite, A., Paulauskas, A., & Brygadyrenko, V. V.
- Affiliations
- Vytautas Magnus University (LT)
- Oles Honchar Dnipro National University (UA)
- ORCID
- Brygadyrenko, V. V.
- Venue
- Biosystems Diversity
- Published
- 2025-11-19
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e2560
- ISSN
- 2519-8513 (ISSN-L)
- 2520-2529
- OpenAlex
- W7131680577
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Biosystems Diversity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Vytautas Magnus University (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Pesticide Research
- Keywords
- neonicotinoids, non-target arthropods, insecticide toxicity, LC50, soil invertebrates, ground beetles, Collembola, Pholcidae, Histeridae, trophic specialization, non-target effects of pesticides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review