The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DIVERSIDAD BIOCULTURAL: INNOVANDO EN INVESTIGACIÓN PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN
Abstract
La conservación de la biodiversidad puede ser más ética y eficaz enfocando simultáneamente la erosión biológica y cultural. Esta idea se encuentra en los postulados funcionales y éticos iniciales de la biología de la conservación. Sin embargo la investigación para la conservación ha enfatizado los inventarios, la cuantificación y la georreferenciación de la diversidad biológica con miras a su utilización. Se le asigna poca relevancia al valor intrínseco de la biodiversidad ante lo cual se hacen llamados a explorar formas apropiadas de “vivir con” la biodiversidad. Esta reflexión responde a ese llamado. Introduce el enfoque biocultural como una perspectiva más comprehensiva para reconocer e investigar las complejas interrelaciones entre procesos ecológicos y dinámicas culturales. Para la investigación se resalta de este enfoque la necesidad de reconocer los derechos de los pueblos indígenas y comunidades locales, al igual que las cosmovisiones que le dan sentido a las prácticas y relaciones que las comunidades establecen con el ambiente. Se explora la base de datos Scienti del período 1991- 2010 en cuanto al registro de investigaciones sobre biodiversidad que involucran conocimiento tradicional y comunidades. Dado el limitado reconocimiento a las contribuciones de las comunidades, se reseñan las principales barreras que encuentra la adopción del enfoque biocultural en investigación. Se proponen premisas éticas orientadas a transformar actitudes y prácticas en investigación que desconocen derechos ancestrales sobre el territorio y el conocimiento, obstaculizan el reconocimiento del valor intrínseco de la biodiversidad, y como resultado impiden garantizar su conservación en un territorio biodiverso, pluriétnico y multicultural. Abstract The conservation of biodiversity may be deemed ethical and more effective by focusing simultaneously on biological and cultural erosion. This idea was in the functional and ethical principles of the initial understanding in conservation biology. However, biological conservation research has emphasized inventories, quantification and georeferencing biodiversity with utilitarian purposes. Such research gives little importance to the intrinsic value of biodiversity provoking calls to explore appropriate ways of “living with” biodiversity. This paper responds to that call. The biocultural approach offers a more comprehensive view to recognize and investigate the complex interrelationships between ecological processes and cultural dynamics. For research, this approach highlights the need to recognize the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities, as well as the community worldviews that infuse meaning to community practices and relations with the environment. This paper explores biodiversity research data involving traditional knowledge and communities during the period 1991- 2010 in the GroupLac Database. Given the limited recognition to the contributions of communities, this paper outlines the main barriers that the adoption of the biocultural approach faces. The paper proposes ethical guidelines to transform research attitudes and practices that ignore ancestral rights over the territory and traditional knowledge, hinder the recognition of the intrinsic value of biodiversity, and as a result, prevent conservation in a biodiverse, multiethnic and multicultural territory
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Felipe mentionne aussi un universitaire colombien, Gabriel Nemogá, longtemps professeur à l’Université Nationale de Colombie et aujourd’hui à l’université de Winnipeg au Canada, qui fait partie du panel d’experts qui participe au suivi du respect de la décision T-622. Nemogá, un spécialiste en écologie humaine, est très engagé dans la reconnaissance des savoirs indigènes pour la protection de la”
From Le fleuve et ses gardiens: Droits bioculturels en action sur le fleuve Atrato (2022) · cites this paper as Nemogá, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2024) · Foundational Concepts of Decolonial and Southern Epistemologies · doi:10.21832/9781800418868-012 · Cited by 9,810
REDISCOVERY OF TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AS ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:roteka]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,206
The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗
Næss, A. (1973) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/00201747308601682 · Cited by 2,743
Scheid-Cook, T. L., & Leopold, A. (1993) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1319034 · Cited by 2,141
Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management
Robbins, P., & Berkes, F. (2000) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/144393 · Cited by 1,753
Indigenous Research Methodologies
Hanson, C. (2012) · International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies · doi:10.5204/ijcis.v5i1.97 · Cited by 1,700
(1985) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1310054 · Cited by 1,645
The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary
(2007) · The Selected Works of Arne Naess · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_85 · Cited by 1,242
Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (2026) · Resonance · doi:10.1007/s12045-026-2064-6 · Cited by 1,192
The Pristine Myth: The Landscape of the Americas in 1492
Denevan, W. M. (1992) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1992.tb01965.x · Cited by 938
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Bachelard G. La formación del Espíritu Científico. México: Editorial Siglo XXI; 2004. 306 p.
- Bacon F, Novum Organum. Devey J. Ed., Nueva York: P.F. Collier 1902. 333 p.
- Bola-os de Tattay G. Desde la Escuela y Hasta la Universidad: Educación Propia para un Buen y Mejor Gobierno. In: López LE, editor. Interculturalidad, Educación y Ciudadanía: Perspectivas Latinoamericanas. La Paz: Plural Editores; 2009. p. 355-376.
- Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social (CONPES). Política Nacional de Competitividad y Productividad Conpes. Documento Conpes 3527. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación; 2008. 83 p.
- Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social (CONPES). Política para el Desarrollo Comercial de la Biotecnología a partir del Uso Sostenible de la Biodiversidad. Documento Conpes 3697. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación; 2011. 36 p.
- Correa F, editor. La Selva Humanizada. Ecología Alternativa en el Trópico Húmedo Colombiano. Bogotá: ICAN-Fondo FEN Colombia-Fondo Editorial CEREC; 1990. 255 p.
- Descartes R. Discurso del Método y Meditaciones Profundas. Madrid: Espasa Calpe; 2010. 97 p.
- Devall B, Sessions G. Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered. Salt Lake City, Utah: G. M. Smith; 1985. 267 p.
- Grupo de Investigación Política y Legislación Sobre Biodiversidad, Recursos Genéticos y Conocimiento Tradicional (PLEBIO). Base de Datos ARG. Bogotá; 2013.
- Hallowel I. Ojibwa Ontology, Behavior and Worldview. In: Diamond S, editor. Culture and History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin. New York: Columbia University Press; 1960. p. 19-52.
- Ishizawa J. Affirmation of Cultural Diversity – Learning with the Communities in the Central Andes. In: Tauli-Corpus V, Enkiwe-Abayao L, De Chavez R, editors. Towards an Alternative Development Paradigm: Indigenous People's Self-Determined Development. Baguio City: Tebtebba Foundation; 2010. p. 205-247
- Keller D. Deep Ecology. In Callicot J, Frodeman R, editors. Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy. Volumen 1. Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale; 2009. p. 206-211.
- López G, Sierra Z. Presentación. Educación y Pedagogía. 2007;19(49):9-18.
- Nadasdy P. "We Don't Harvest Animals; We Kill Them": Agricultural Metaphors and the Politics of Wildlife Management in the Yukon. In: Goldman M, Nasdady P, Turner MD, editors. Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011. 145 p.
- Nemogá G. Investigación Genética y Políticas sobre Biodiversidad: Escenarios para el Reconocimiento de la Diversidad Étnica y Cultural. Bogotá: Ibá-ez Editores; 2013. 144 p.
- Nieto M. Remedios para el Imperio: Historia Natural y la Apropiación del Nuevo Mundo. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia; 2000. 280 p.
- Pacheco MD, Castellanos O, Carrizosa S, Jiménez C, Clavijo A, DEL Portillo P. La biotecnología, Motor de Desarrollo para la Colombia de 2015. Bogotá: Colciencias; 2008. 264 p.
- Popper K. La Lógica de la Investigación Científica. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos; 1980. 451 p.
- Posey DA. Nomadic Agriculture of the Amazon. Garden: New York Botanical Garden Magazine. 1982;6(1):18-24.
- Posey DA. The Kayapó: the Role of Intellectual Property in Resource Management in the Brazilian Amazon. In: Posey DA, Dutfield G, editors. Indigenous Peoples and Sustainability: Cases and Actions. Utrecht: IUCN and International Books; 1997. p. 240-254.
- Posey DA. Kayapó Ethnoecology and Culture. Plenderleith K, editor. London: Routledge; 2002. 255 p.
- Reichel-Dolmatoff G. Amazonian Cosmos: The sexual and Religious Symbolism of the Tukano Indians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1971. 290 p.
- Sherry E, Myers H. Traditional Environmental Knowledge in PracticeSoc Nat Resour. 2002;15(4):345-358.
- Suzuki DA. Personal Foreword: The Value of Native Ecologies. In: Knudtson P, Suzuki D, editors. Wisdom of the Elders: Sacred Native Stories of Nature. New York: Bantam Books; 2006. p. xxvii-xliv.
- Swiderska K, Argumedo A, Song Y, Li J, Pant R, Herrera H, et al. Protecting Community Rights over Traditional Knowledge: Implications of Customary Laws and Practices. Key Findings and Recommendations 2005- 2009. London: IIED; 2009. 21 p.
Cited by
Le fleuve et ses gardiens: Droits bioculturels en action sur le fleuve Atrato
Revet, S. (2022) · Terrain · doi:10.4000/terrain.22695 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Nemogá, G. R.
- Venue
- Acta Biológica Colombiana
- Publisher
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Published
- 2016-03-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1Supl
- Pages
- 311-319
- ISSN
- 1900-1649
- 0120-548X
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 38
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.