The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Predictive Modelling in Dutch Archaeology, Joining Forces
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The model can easily be tested with statistical methods as the archaeological data set is not used for building the model.AfterKamermans and Wansleeben (1999)”
From Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene (2012) · cites this paper as Kamermans and Wansleeben 1999
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Figure: 2 Fig. 2 Fig.2The procedure used for deductive predictive modeling.The model is created on the basis of hypotheses on site location preferences.In many cases, these are no more than”
From Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene (2012) · cites this paper as Kamermans and Wansleeben 1999
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- ATTWELL, and FLETCHER M. (1985), "A new technique for investigating spatial relationships: Significance testing", in: VOORRIPS A. and LOVING S. H. (eds), To Pattern the Past, PACT, Conseil de l'Europe, Strasbourg, pp. 181--189.
- ATTWELL, M. R. and FLETCHER M. (1987), "An Analytical Technique for Investigating Spatial Relationships", Journal of Archaeological Science, 14, pp. 1-11.
- BRANDT, R., GROENEWOUDT B. J. and KVAMME K.L. (1992), "An experiment in archaeological site location: modeling in the Netherlands using GIS techniques", World Archaeology 24, pp. 268-282.
- CARR, C. (1985), "Introductory remarks on Regional Analysis", in: CARR C. (ed.), For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis. Bridging Data Structure, Quantitative Technique, and Theory, Westport Publishers, Kansas City, pp. 114-127.
- DEEBEN, J., HALLEWAS D.P., KOLEN J., WIEMER R., (1997), "Beyond the Crystal Ball. Predictive Modelling as a Tool in Archaeological Heritage Management and Occupation History", in: WILLEMS W.J.H., KARS H., HALLEWAS D. P. (eds), Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands, Van Gorcum, Assen, pp. 76-118.
- GOULD R.A. (ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology, Albuquerque, pp. 77-101
- GROENEWOUDT, B.J., HALLEW AS D.P. and ZOETBROOD P.A.M. (1994), De degradatie van de archeologische betekenis van de Nederlandse bodem, Interne Rapporten ROB, Vol. 13, ROB, Amersfoort.
- HAMOND, F.W. (1980), "The Interpretation of Archaeological Distribution Maps: Biases Inherent in Archaeological Fieldwork", Archaeo-Physika 7, pp. 193- 216.
- KAMERMANS, H., LOVING S.H. and VOORRIPS A. (1985), "Changing patterns of prehistoric land use in the Agro Pontino", in: MALONE C.and STODDART S. (eds), Papers in Italian Archaeology IV. Part i The Human Landscape. BAR International Series 243, pp. 53-68.
- KAMERMANS, H. (1996), "The Agro Pontino Survey project: a summary of the application of land evaluation", in: MILLIKEN S. and PERETTO C. (eds.), Archaeology, Methodology and the organisation of research, Forli, pp. 51-60.
- SCHIFFER M.B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory,Vol 9, Academic Press, New York, pp. 397-452.
- KVAMME, K.L. (1988), "Development and testing of quantitative models", in: JUDGE W.L. and SEBASTIAN L. (eds), Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, US Bureau of Land Management, Denver, pp. 324-428.
- KVAMME, K.L. (1990), "The fundamental principles and practice of predictive archaeological modeling", in: VOORRIPS A. (ed.), Mathematics and Information Science In Archaeology: A Flexible Framework, Studies In Modem Archaeology, Vol. 3, Holos, Bonn, pp. 257- 295.
- LEUSEN, P. M. van (1995), "GIS and archaeological resource management: a European agenda", in: LOCK G.and STANCIC Z. (eds), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 27-41.
- LEUSEN, P.M. van (1996), "GIS and Locational Modeling in Dutch Archaeology: A Review of Current Approaches" in: Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 23, pp. 177-197.
- Allen K.M.S., Green S.W. and Zubrow E.B.W. (eds), Interpreting Space: GIS and archaeology, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 22-32.
- SCHIFFER, M.B. (1972), "Archaeological Context and Systemic Context", A me ric an Antiquity 3 7, pp. 156-165.
- SCHIFFER, M.B. (1976), Behavioral Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.
- SIEGEL, S. (1956), Nonparametric Statistics for the behavioral sciences, McGraw-Hill, Tokyo.
- VERHAGEN, P. (1995), "De archeologische potentiekaart in Nederland: een methodologie voor het voorspellen van archeologische waarden op basis van archeologische en landschappelijke gegevens", Westerheem XLIV -5, pp. 177-187.
- WANSLEEBEN, M. and VERHART L.B.M. (1995), "Meuse Valley Project: GIS and Site Location Statistics", Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 25, Lei den, pp. 99-108.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene
Verhagen, P., & Whitley, T. G. (2012) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-011-9102-7 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Unknown, (.
- Venue
- Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
- Publisher
- Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
- Published
- 1999
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
