The DOI matches its DataCite record.
GPS-aided Walking Experiments and Data-driven Travel Cost Modeling on the Historical Road of Nakasend?-Kisoji (Central Highland Japan)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Walking on slope is the only type of movement for which there is reasonably detailed experimental evidence.
“Also, walking on slope is the only type of movement for which there is reasonably detailed experimental evidence (Margaria 1938;Imhof 1950;Givoni and Goldman 1971;Pandolf et al. 1977;Ericson and Goldstein 1980;Minetti et al. 2002;Langmuir 2004;Kondo and Seino 2010).”
From Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Kondo and Seino 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches
Verhagen, P., Nuninger, L., & Groenhuijzen, M. R. (2019) · Computational Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04576-0_11 · Cited by 117
Güimil-Fariña, A., & Parcero-Oubiña, C. (2015) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.030 · Cited by 95
Alberti, G. (2019) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2019.100331 · Cited by 40
Explaining known past routes, underdetermination, and the use of multiple cost functions
Lewis, J. (2024) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-023-09621-w · Cited by 15
Refining hernando de soto's route using electric circuit theory and CircuitScape
Thayn, J. B., Sampeck, K., & Spaccapaniccia, M. (2016) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1080/00330124.2015.1124787 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Unknown, (.
- Venue
- Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
- Publisher
- Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
- Published
- 2010
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
