CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making the Most of Soils in Archaeology. A Review

Salisbury, Roderick B., Bull, Ian D., Cereda, Susanna, Draganits, Erich, Dulias, Katharina, Kowarik, Kerstin, Meyer, Matthias, Zavala, Elena I., Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina·2022·Archaeologia Austriaca
DOI 10.1553/archaeologia106s319
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1553/archaeologia106s319

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. W. E. Dean, Determination of carbonate and organic matter in cal- careous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparisons with other methods, Journal of Sedimentary Pe- trology 44, 1974, 242-248.
  2. H. Dinel, M. Schnitzer, G. Mehuys, Soil lipids: origin, nature, content, decomposition and effect on soil physical properties. In: J. M. Bollag, G. Stotzky (Eds.), Soil Biochemistry. New York 1990, 397-430.
  3. E. Draganits, Geologie, Geoarchäologie und Ethnogeoarchäolo- gie im Kontext des Salzbergbaus von Chehrābād. In: T. Stöll- ner, A. Aali, N. Bagherpour Kashani (Eds.), Tod im Salz: Eine archäologische Ermittlung in Persien. Oppenheim 2020, 189-194.
  4. Draganits et al. 2019 E. Draganits, S. Gier, N. Doneus, M. Doneus, Geoarchaeological evaluation of the Roman topography and accessibility by sea of ancient Osor (Cres Island, Croatia), Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences 112, 2019, 1-19.
  5. D. Dreslerová, M. Hajnalová, J. Trubač, T. Chuman, P. Kočár, E. Kunzová, L. Šefrna, Maintaining soil productivity as the key factor in European prehistoric and medieval farming, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 35, 2021, 102633.
  6. E. Eckmeier, G. L. B. Wiesenberg, Short-chain n-alkanes (C16-20) in ancient soil are useful molecular markers for prehistoric bio- mass burning, Journal of Archaeological Science 36/7, 2009, 1590-1596.
  7. R. P. Evershed, P. H. Bethell, P. Reynolds, L. J. Goad, 5β-Stig- mastanol and related 5β-stanols as biomarkers of manuring: analysis of modern experimental material and assessment of the archaeological potential, Journal of Archeological Science 24, 1997, 485-495.
  8. G. Furlan, J. Bonetto, C. Nicosia, The excavation of the sequence preserved in front of the façade of the Sarno Baths, Pompeii, Journal of Cultural Heritage 40, 2019, 324-332.
  9. R. Gerlach, E. Eckmeier, Prehistoric land use and its impact on soil formation since Early Neolithic: examples from the Lower Rhine area, Journal of Ancient Studies 3, 2012, 11-16.
  10. B. Hjulström, S. Isaksson, Identification of activity area signatures in a reconstructed Iron Age house by combining element and lipid analyses of sediments, Journal of Archaeological Science 36/1, 2009, 174-183.
  11. V. T. Holliday, W. G. Gartner, Methods of soil P analysis in archae- ology, Journal of Archaeological Science 34/2, 2007, 301-333.
  12. Jansen et al. 2019 B. Jansen, H. Hooghiemstra, S. P. C. de Goede, J. M. van Mour- ik, Chapter 5: biomarker analysis of soil archives. In: J. M. van Mourik, J. J. M. van der Meer (Eds.), Reading the Soil Ar- chives. Developments in Quaternary Science 18, Amsterdam 2019, 163-222.
  13. J. Kainz, An integrated archaeological prospection and excava- tion approach at a Middle Neolithic circular ditch enclosure in Austria. In: M. Forte, S. Campana (Eds.), Digital Methods and Remote Sensing in Archaeology: Archaeology in the Age of Sensing. Cham 2016, 371-403.
  14. M. Kanstrup, M. K. Holst, P. M. Jensen, I. K. Thomsen, B. T. Christensen, Searching for long-term trends in prehistoric manuring practice: δ 15 N analyses of charred cereal grains from the 4 th to the 1 st millennium BC, Journal of Archaeological Sci- ence 51/0, 2014, 115-125.
  15. Koromila et al. 2018 G. Koromila, P. Karkanas, Y. Hamilakis, N. Kyparissi- Apostolika, G. Kotzamani, K. Harris, The Neolithic tell as a multi-species monument: human, animal, and plant relation- ships through a micro-contextual study of animal dung remains at Koutroulou Magoula, central Greece, Journal of Archaeolog- ical Science: Reports 19, 2018, 753-768.
  16. C. Lubos, S. Dreibrodt, A. Bahr, Analysing spatio-temporal pat- terns of archaeological soils and sediments by comparing pXRF and different ICP-OES extraction methods, Journal of Archaeo- logical Science: Reports 9, 2016, 44-53.
  17. R. I. Macphail, P. Goldberg, Applied Soils and Micromorpho- logy in Archaeology. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology, Cambridge 2017.
  18. D. Massilani, M. W. Morley, S. M. Mentzer, V. Aldeias, B. Vernot, C. Miller, M. Stahlschmidt, M. B. Kozlikin, M. V. Shunkov, A. P. Derevianko, N. J. Conard, S. Wurz, C. S. Henshilwood, J. Vasquez, E. Essel, S. Nagel, J. Richter, B. Nickel, R. G. Roberts, S. Pääbo, V. Slon, P. Goldberg, M. Meyer, Microstratigraphic preservation of ancient faunal and hominin DNA in Pleistocene cave sediments, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119/1, 2022, e2113666118.
  19. W. D. Middleton, T. D. Price, Identification of activity areas by multi-element characterization of sediments from modern and archaeological house floors using inductively coupled plasma- atomic emission spectroscopy, Journal of Archaeological Science 23, 1996, 673-687.
  20. D. W. Nelson, L. E. Sommers, Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis 2: Chemical and Biological Properties. Agronomy Monograph 9, Madison 1982, 539-579.
  21. C. Nicosia, G. Stoops (Eds.), Archaeological Soil and Sediment Mi- cromorphology. Newark 2017.
  22. K. M. Nielsen, L. Calamai, G. Pietramellara, Stabilization of extracellular DNA and proteins by transient binding to various soil components. In: P. Nannipieri, K. Smalla (Eds.), Nucleic Acids and Proteins in Soil. Berlin -Heidelberg 2006, 141-157.
  23. G. A. Pope (Ed.), Weathering and Soils Geomorphology. Treatise on Geomorphology 4, Amsterdam 2013.
  24. Rawlence et al. 2014 N. J. Rawlence, D. J. Lowe, J. R. Wood, J. M. Young, G. J. Churchman, Y.-T. Huang, A. Cooper, Using palaeoenvi- ronmental DNA to reconstruct past environments: progress and prospects, Journal of Quaternary Science 29/7, 2014, 610-626.
  25. Riddiford et al. 2016 N. G. Riddiford, N. P. Branch, S. Jusseret, L. Olivier, C. P. Green, Investigating the human-environment relationship of early intensive salt production: a case study from the Upper Seille Valley, Lorraine, northeast France, Journal of Archaeolog- ical Science: Reports 10, 2016, 390-402.
  26. C. I. Roos, K. C. Nolan, Phosphates, plowzones, and plazas: a mini- mally invasive approach to settlement structure of plowed village sites, Journal of Archaeological Science 39/1, 2012, 23-32.
  27. R. B. Salisbury, Links in the chain: evidence for crafting and activ- ity areas in late prehistoric cultural soilscapes. In: A. Gorgues, K. Rebay-Salisbury, R. B. Salisbury (Eds.), Material Chains in Late Prehistoric Europe and the Mediterranean: Time, Space, and Technologies of Production. Mémoires 48, Bordeaux 2017, 47-65.
  28. Shillito et al. 2011 L.-M. Shillito, I. D. Bull, W. Matthews, M. J. Almond, J. M. Williams, R. P. Evershed, Biomolecular and micromor- phological analysis of suspected faecal deposits at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey, Journal of Archaeological Science 38/8, 2011, 1869-1877.
  29. van der Plicht, Streurman, van Mourik 2019 J. van der Plicht, H. J. Streurman, J. van Mourik, Radiocarbon dating of soil archives. In: J. V. Mourik, J. van der Meer (Eds.), Reading the Soil Archives. Developments in Quaternary Science 18, Amsterdam 2019, 81-113.
  30. B. Vernot, E. I. Zavala, A. Gómez-Olivencia, Z. Jacobs, V. Slon, F. Mafessoni, F. Romagné, A. Pearson, M. Petr, N. Sala, A. Pablos, A. Aranburu, J. M. B. de Castro, E. Carbonell, B. Li, M. T. Krajcarz, A. I. Krivoshapkin, K. A. Kolobova, M. B. Kozlikin, M. V. Shunkov, A. P. Derevianko, B. Vio- la, S. Grote, E. Essel, D. L. Herráez, S. Nagel, B. Nickel, J. Richter, A. Schmidt, B. Peter, J. Kelso, R. G. Roberts, J.-L. Arsuaga, M. Meyer, Unearthing Neanderthal population history using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from cave sedi- ments, Science 372/6542, 2021, eabf1667.
  31. L. Vrydaghs, T. B. Ball, Y. Devos, Beyond redundancy and mul- tiplicity: integrating phytolith analysis and micromorphology to the study of Brussels dark earth, Journal of Archaeological Science 68, 2016, 79-88.
  32. Vyncke et al. 2011 K. Vyncke, P. Degryse, E. Vassilieva, M. Waelkens, Identifying domestic functional areas: chemical analysis of floor sediments at the Classical-Hellenistic settlement at Düzen Tepe (SW Turkey), Journal of Archaeological Science 38/9, 2011, 2274-2292.
  33. A. J. White, L. R. Stevens, V. Lorenzi, S. E. Munoz, C. P. Lipo, S. Schroeder, An evaluation of fecal stanols as indicators of population change at Cahokia, Illinois, Journal of Archaeolog- ical Science 93, 2018, 129-134.
  34. C. A. Wilson, M. S. Cresser, D. A. Davidson, Sequential element extraction of soils from abandoned farms: an investigation of the partition of anthropogenic element inputs from historic land use, Journal of Environmental Monitoring 8/4, 2006, 439-444.
  35. C. A. Wilson, D. A. Davidson, M. S. Cresser, Multi-element soil analysis: an assessment of its potential as an aid to archaeologi- cal interpretation, Journal of Archaeological Science 35/2, 2008, 412-424.
  36. C. M. Wurster, M. I. Bird, I. D. Bull, F. Creed, C. Bryant, J. A. J. Dungait, V. Paz, Forest contraction in north equatorial southeast Asia during the Last Glacial Period, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107/35, 2010, 15508-15511.
  37. Zalasiewicz et al. 2019 J. Zalasiewicz, C. N. Waters, M. Williams, C. P. Summerhayes (Eds.), The anthropocene as a geological time unit: a guide to the scientific evidence and current debate. Cambridge 2019.
  38. M. Zech, B. Buggle, K. Leiber, S. Marković, B. Glaser, U. Hambach, B. Huwe, T. Stevens, P. Sümegi, G. Wiesenberg, L. Zöller, Reconstructing Quaternary vegetation history in the Carpathian Basin, SE-Europe, using n-alkane biomarkers as molecular fossils: problems and possible solutions, potential and limitations, Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart: Quaternary Science Journal 58/2, 2010, 148-155.
  39. R. Zocatelli, M. Lavrieux, T. Guillemot, L. Chassiot, C. Le Milbeau, J. Jacob, Fecal biomarker imprints as indicators of past human land uses: source distinction and preservation potential in archaeological and natural archives, Journal of Archaeological Science 81, 2017, 79-89.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Salisbury, R. B., Bull, I. D., Cereda, S., Draganits, E., Dulias, K., Kowarik, K., Meyer, M., Zavala, E. I., & Rebay-Salisbury, K.
ORCID
Venue
Archaeologia Austriaca
Publisher
Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Verlag
Published
2022
Volume
Band 106/2022
Pages
319-334
ISSN
  • 0003-8008
  • 1816-2959
DOI
10.1553/archaeologia106s319
Cited by
19
References
1
Language
de

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review