The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Contribution to the Military Revolution Debate: The Janissaries Use of Volley Fire during the Long Ottoman-Habsburg WaroOf 1593-1606 and the Problem of Origins
Abstract
According to proponents of the “Military Revolution” theory, musketry volley fire was among the military innovations that fundamentally altered early modern field warfare. The origins of European volley fire date back to the 1590s, but no western army, with the possible exception of the Dutch in 1600, was able to use this tactic in action until the 1620s. Furthermore, it has been thus far assumed that the Ottomans failed to adopt this new tactic and thus experienced setbacks in the face of their European adversaries during this period. By utilising hitherto overlooked Ottoman narrative and visual sources, this article first shows that the Janissaries were indeed using volley fire in action in 1605, and possibly before. Secondly, it raises questions about the origins of Ottoman volley fire, which are currently unclear. Overall, the Janissaries' use of this tactic during the Long War not only affects our understanding of Ottoman warfare but also necessitates a reassessment of the patterns of invention and diffusion of military innovations in the early modern period.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ottoman historians have suggested that volley fire might have been deployed in 1526 at the famous Battle of Mohács.”
From The Arquebus Volley Technique in China, c. 1560: Evidence from the Writings of Qi Jiguang (2015) · cites this paper as Börekçi 2006, 407-438
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parker, G. (2007) · The Journal of Military History · doi:10.1353/jmh.2007.0142 · Cited by 52
“A Korean Military Revolution? Parallel Military Innovations in East Asia and Europe.”
Andrade, T., Kang, H. H., & Cooper, K. (2014) · Journal of World History · doi:10.1353/jwh.2014.0000 · Cited by 23
The Arquebus Volley Technique in China, c. 1560: Evidence from the Writings of Qi Jiguang
Andrade, T. (2015) · Journal of Chinese Military History · doi:10.1163/22127453-12341284 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Börekç, G.
- Venue
- Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
- Publisher
- Akademiai Kiado Zrt.
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407-438
- ISSN
- 0001-6446 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2667
- OpenAlex
- W1988422648
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Orientalia (publishedVersion)
- Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Ottoman Empire History and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical Turkish Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Military history and social perspectives
- Keywords
- military revolution, Janissaries, Ottoman military history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review