Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion
Abstract
Complementary neurophysiological recordings in macaques and functional neuroimaging in humans show that the primary taste cortex in the rostral insula and adjoining frontal operculum provides separate and combined representations of the taste, temperature, and texture (including viscosity and fat texture) of food in the mouth independently of hunger and thus of reward value and pleasantness. One synapse on, in the orbitofrontal cortex, these sensory inputs are for some neurons combined by learning with olfactory and visual inputs. Different neurons respond to different combinations, providing a rich representation of the sensory properties of food. The representation of taste and other food-related stimuli in the orbitofrontal cortex of macaques is found from its lateral border throughout area 13 to within 7 mm of the midline, and in humans the representation of food-related and other pleasant stimuli is found particularly in the medial orbitofrontal cortex. In the orbitofrontal cortex, feeding to satiety with one food decreases the responses of these neurons to that food, but not to other foods, showing that sensory-specific satiety is computed in the primate (including human) orbitofrontal cortex. Consistently, activation of parts of the human orbitofrontal cortex correlates with subjective ratings of the pleasantness of the taste and smell of food. Cognitive factors, such as a word label presented with an odour, influence the pleasantness of the odour, and the activation produced by the odour in the orbitofrontal cortex. Food intake is thus controlled by building a multimodal representation of the sensory properties of food in the orbitofrontal cortex, and gating this representation by satiety signals to produce a representation of the pleasantness or reward value of food which drives food intake. A neuronal representation of taste is also found in the pregenual cingulate cortex, which receives inputs from the orbitofrontal cortex, and in humans many pleasant stimuli activate the pregenual cingulate cortex, pointing towards this as an important area in motivation and emotion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rostral insula, connected to primary taste cortex, provides information to the OFC that influences its multimodal representation of the pleasantness or reward value of incoming food.
“In addition, the rostral insula (connected to primary taste cortex) provides information to the OFC that influences its multimodal representation of the pleasantness or reward value of incoming food (138).”
From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [138]
The rostral insula provides information to the OFC that influences its multimodal representation of pleasantness or reward value of incoming food.
“In addition, the rostral insula (connected to primary taste cortex) provides information to the OFC that influences its multimodal representation of the pleasantness or reward value of incoming food (97).”
From The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [97]
The insula is a primary gustatory area that participates in many aspects of eating behavior, such as taste; the rostral insula provides information to the OFC to influence its multimodal representation of the pleasantness or reward value of incoming food.
“The insula is also a primary gustatory area, which participates in many aspects of eating behavior, such as taste.In addition, the rostral insula (connected to primary taste cortex) provides information to the OFC to influence its multimodal representation of the pleasantness or reward value of incoming food (Rolls 2008).”
From Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction (2011) · cites this paper as Rolls 2008
Because of the insula's involvement in the interoceptive sense of the body, in emotional awareness, and in motivation and emotion, a contribution of insular impairment in obesity could be expected.
“Because of the insular's involvement in the interoceptive sense of the body, in emotional awareness (Craig 2003) and in motivation and emotion (Rolls 2008), a contribution of insular impairment in obesity could be expected.”
From Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction (2011) · cites this paper as Rolls 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 132 · Cited by 214
- Authors
- Rolls, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rolls, E.
- ORCID
- Rolls, E.
- Venue
- Acta Physiologica Hungarica
- Publisher
- Akademiai Kiado Zrt.
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-164
- ISSN
- 0231-424X (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2167148728
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Physiologica Hungarica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Keywords
- orbitofrontal cortex, olfaction, sensory-specific satiety, food intake regulation, appetite, food reward, food enjoyment, frontal operculum, satiety signals, motivation, emotions, macaque, human
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Appetite, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Satiety Response, Smell, Taste
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review