Imaging cellular markers of neuroinflammation in the brain of the rat model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurological disorder affecting upper and lower motoneurons. Since immune disbalance is known to be an important manifestation of the disease, working with the familial ALS rat model, hSODG93A (containing multiple copies of the human SOD1 G93A mutation), we were particularly interested in following by live magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the immune cells labeled by ultra small paramagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles. In addition, microglial activation was studied by immunocytochemistry. MRI of USPIO labeled Tcells revealed CD4+ lymphocyte infiltration in the midbraininterbrain region while the CD8+ cells were more confined to the brainstem region. By way of gadolinium (Gd) contrast it was also confirmed that the bloodbrain barrier (BBB) was compromised. Moreover, it was revealed that the regions of BBB breakthrough were congruent with the MRI foci of Tcell infiltration. Immunocytochemistry revealed microglial activation and fusion, possibly phagocytic interactions with neurons in the hippocampus and brainstem. These observations prove the existence of an elaborate inflammatory process in the brain of hSODG93A rats, and also demonstrates the complexity and multifocality of ALS as having its inflammatory manifestations also in the central nervous system (hippocampus) distinct from clinically described motor foci of degeneration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early BBB breakdown was also shown in SOD1 G93A rats at a presymptomatic stage and has been confirmed using different contrast-enhanced MRI techniques.
“Early BBB breakdown was also shown in SOD1 G93A rats at a presymptomatic stage (431) and has been confirmed using different contrast-enhanced MRI techniques (20, 51).”
From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 7 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Bataveljić, D., Stamenković, S., Bačić, G., & Andjus, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- Venue
- Acta Physiologica Hungarica
- Publisher
- Akademiai Kiado Zrt.
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-31
- ISSN
- 0231-424X (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2094861884
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Physiologica Hungarica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- ALS Association
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Keywords
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, neuroinflammation, microglial activation, T cell infiltration, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, blood-brain barrier disruption, hippocampus, brainstem
- MeSH terms
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Animals, Brain, Dextrans, Encephalitis, Immunohistochemistry, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motor Neurons, T-Lymphocytes, Biomarkers, Microglia, Rats, Magnetite Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review