The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Block Copolymer Lithography: Merging “Bottom-Up” with “Top-Down” Processes
Abstract
As the size scale of device features becomes ever smaller, conventional lithographic processes become increasingly more difficult and expensive, especially at a minimum feature size of less than 45 nm. Consequently, to achieve higher-density circuits, storage devices, or displays, it is evident that alternative routes need to be developed to circumvent both cost and manufacturing issues. An ideal process would be compatible with existing technological processes and manufacturing techniques; these strategies, together with novel materials, could allow significant advances to be made in meeting both short-term and long-term demands for higher-density, faster devices. The self-assembly of block copolymers (BCPs), two polymer chains covalently linked together at one end, provides a robust solution to these challenges. As thin films, immiscible BCPs self-assemble into a range of highly ordered morphologies where the size scale of the features is only limited by the size of the polymer chains and are, therefore, nanoscopic. While self-assembly alone is sufficient for a number of applications in fabricating advanced microelectronics, directed, self-orienting, self-assembly processes are also required to produce complex devices with the required density and addressability of elements to meet future demands. Both strategies require the design and synthesis of polymers that have well-defined characteristics such that the necessary fine control over the morphology, interfacial properties, and simplicity of processes can be realized. By combining tailored self-assembly processes (a “bottom-up” approach) with microfabrication processes (a “top-down” approach), the ever-present thirst of the consumer for faster, better, and cheaper devices can be met in very simple, yet robust, ways. The integration of novel chemistries with the manipulation of self-assembly will be treated in this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Physics of Block Copolymers
Hamley, I. W. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198502180.001.0001 · Cited by 1,913
The convergence of synthetic organic and polymer chemistries
Hawker, C. J., & Wooley, K. L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1109778 · Cited by 1,298
Self-citation
Cited by
Bai, J., Zhong, X., Jiang, S., Huang, Y., & Duan, X. (2010) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.8 · Cited by 1,378
Directing the self-assembly of block copolymers
Darling, S. B. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.004 · Cited by 1,019
Block copolymer based nanostructures: Materials, processes, and applications to electronics
Kim, H.-C., Park, S.-M., & Hinsberg, W. D. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900159v · Cited by 1,017
Macroscopic 10-terabit–per–square-inch arrays from block copolymers with lateral order
Park, S., Lee, D. H., Xu, J., Kim, B., Hong, S. W., Jeong, U., Xu, T., & Russell, T. P. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168108 · Cited by 740
Self-citationLi, C., Li, Q., Kaneti, Y. V., Hou, D., Yamauchi, Y., & Mai, Y. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00021c · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawker, C. J., & Russell, T. P.
- Venue
- MRS Bulletin
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 952-966
- ISSN
- 0883-7694 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1425
- OpenAlex
- W2118625035
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Block Copolymer Lithography: Merging “Bottom-Up” with “Top-Down” Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1557/mrs2005.249
- The paper
- Hawker, C. J., & Russell, T. P. (2005). Block Copolymer Lithography: Merging “Bottom-Up” with “Top-Down” Processes. MRS Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2005.249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.