The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spirituality and Perceived Supervisor Support as Predictors of Academic Integrity of Final-Year Undergraduate Students
Abstract
Research on academic integrity among final-year students preparing mini-theses is still limited in Indonesia, particularly in Islamic universities. Therefore, this research aimed to assess the influence of spirituality and supervisor support on academic integrity of final-year students at an Islamic university in Bandung. A correlational quantitative method was adopted focusing on the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Using a census method, data was collected from a total of 205 final-year students. The results showed that multiple regression analysis exhibited an F-value of 86.525 with a p-value < 0.05, implying the collective influence of spirituality and supervisor support on academic integrity by 46.1%. These observations showed that spirituality had a greater impact on academic integrity than supervisor support among participants. A detailed explanation of this research was provided in the subsequent sections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Natanael et al. (2024) found that a supportive supervisor environment has a positive influence on the academic integrity of senior students.”
From The Relationship between Academic Stress and Academic Integrity among University Students Moderated by Social Support (2026) · cites this paper as Natanael et al. (2024)
In the citing paper
“Natanael et al. (2024) regarding the positive association between a supportive supervisor environment and the academic integrity of senior students”
From The Relationship between Academic Stress and Academic Integrity among University Students Moderated by Social Support (2026) · cites this paper as Natanael et al. (2024)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., Pyun, Y., Aycock, C., & Coyle, S. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000058 · Cited by 946
Academic integrity: A review of the literature
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709495 · Cited by 359
Academic Integrity in Online Assessment: A Research Review
Holden, O. L., Norris, M. E., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.639814 · Cited by 310 · cited 1×
“The advancement of technology-facilitated by universities when students are learning in class strongly impacts academic integrity (Holden et al., 2021).”
BackgroundConstruction of academic integrity scale
Ramdani, Z. (2018) · International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology · doi:10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3003 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Ampuni, S., Kautsari, N., Maharani, M., Kuswardani, S., & Buwono, S. B. S. (2020). Academic dishonesty in Indonesian college students: An investigation from a moral psychology perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09352-2 · DOI
- Ayoub/Al-Salim, M. I., & Aladwan, K. (2021). The relationship between academic integrity of online university students and its effects on academic performance and learning quality. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology, 1(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEET-02-2021-0009 · DOI
- BieliauskaitÄ—, J. (2021). Solidarity in academia and its relationship to academic integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09420-6 · DOI
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publication, Inc.
- Gray, P. W., & Jordan, S. R. (2012). Supervisors and academic integrity: Supervisors as exemplars and mentors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(4), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9155-6 · DOI
- Khan, I. U., Khalid, A., Hasnain, S. A., Ullah, S., & Ali, N. (2019). The impact of religiosity and spirituality on academic dishonesty of students in Pakistan. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 8(3), 381–398.
- Laka, L., & Paska, P. E. I. N. (2023). Academic integrity model development to improve psychological well-being. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 2(6), 2645–2655. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i6.457 · DOI
- Lolang, E., Solong, N. P., Sagita, H., Supriyanto, D., & Aziz, F. (2023). The influence of emotional intelligence, spiritual and intellectual on students’ ethical behavior. Journal on Education, 5(3), 7946–7951. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1584 · DOI
- Ludlum, M., Hongell, L., Tigerstedt, C., & Teeman, J. (2017). Academic ethics: A pilot study on the attitudes of finnish students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9284-z · DOI
- Mustapha, R., Hussin, Z., & Siraj, S. (2016). Ketidakjujuran akademik dalam kalangan mahasiswa mulsim di Malaysia: Analisis perbandingan tahun 2014-2015. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 4(1), 41–55.
- Nelson, M. F., James, M. S. L., Miles, A., Morrell, D. L., & Sledge, S. (2017). Academic integrity of millennials: The impact of religion and spirituality. Ethics & Behavior, 27(5), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1158653 · DOI
- Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.
- Rinn, A., Boazman, J., Jackson, A., & Barrio, B. (2014). Locus of control, academic self-concept, and academic dishonesty among high ability college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(4), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.14434/v14i4.12770 · DOI
- Stratton, S. J. (2021). Populations research: Conviniece sampling strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(4), 373–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000649 · DOI
- Verrier, D., & Day, C. (2020). How can we improve the final year dissertation? A consideration of ethics, quality, and one-to-one supervision. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 8(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v8i2.395 · DOI
- Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · DOI · Paper page
- Natanael, Y., Ramdani, Z., Azizah, N., Fauzyah, I., Ruhiyat, H. A., & Putri, M. I. (2024). Spirituality and Perceived Supervisor Support as Predictors of Academic Integrity of Final-Year Undergraduate Students. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 11(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v11i1.34836
- Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): PSYMPATHIC
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sandi, F. F., Suroso, & Suhadianto (2026) · International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science · doi:10.47772/ijriss.2026.100801067
Metadata
- Authors
- Natanael, Y., Ramdani, Z., Azizah, N., Fauzyah, I., Ruhiyat, H. A., & Putri, M. I.
- Venue
- Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
- Published
- 2024-06-29
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-98
- ISSN
- 2502-2903
- 2356-3591
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review