The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of the Pali and Chinese Versions of the Vangisa-thera Samyutta, a Collection of Early Buddhist Discourses on the Venerable Vangisa
Abstract
This article first briefly examines the textual structure of the Vangisathera Samyutta of the Pali Samyutta-nikaya in conjunction with two other versions preserved in Chinese translation in Taisho vol. 2, nos. 99 and 100. Then it compares the main teachings contained in the three versions. These three versions of this collection on the subject of the venerable Vangisa represent three different early Buddhist schools within the Sthavira branch. This comparative study of these three different versions focuses on three major topics: (i) Arhants at the pravarana ceremony; (ii) sensual desire and the way to extinguish it; and (iii) the Buddha’s teachings to Vangisa. It reveals similarities and significant differences in structure and doctrinal content, thus advancing the historical/critical study of early Buddhist doctrine in this area.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But, as noted by Choong (2007: 41) and Bodhi (2007: 56), the main distinction is drawn between arhats ' liberated in both ways ' and arhats ' liberated by wisdom ' .”
From The Pavāraṇā Sutta and “liberation in both ways” as against “liberation by wisdom” (2013) · cites this paper as Choong (2007: 41)
In the citing paper
“Commenting on the Pali, S Ā and S Ā 2 versions of the Pav ā ran ̣ ā Sutta , Choong (2007: 41) says: ' The wisdom-liberated , listed as the last category of Arhant , denotes the most basic and common level of attaining liberation shown in the three versions ' .”
From The Pavāraṇā Sutta and “liberation in both ways” as against “liberation by wisdom” (2013) · cites this paper as Choong (2007: 41)
Citations
Cited by
The Pavāraṇā Sutta and “liberation in both ways” as against “liberation by wisdom”
Kuan, T.-F. (2013) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x12001437 · Cited by 7
Early Buddhist Wisdom Literature: The “Book with Verses” (Sagāthāvagga) of the Saṃyutta nikāya
Shulman, E. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14101322 · Cited by 5
Untitled work
Bucknell, R. S. (2008) · Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal
Metadata
- Authors
- Mun-Keat, C.
- Venue
- Buddhist Studies Review
- Publisher
- Equinox Publishing
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-45
- ISSN
- 0265-2897 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-9681
- OpenAlex
- W1789422873
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Buddhist Studies Review (publishedVersion)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Chinese translation of Buddhist texts, Taisho Tripitaka, textual comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the Pali and Chinese Versions of the Vangisa-thera Samyutta, a Collection of Early Buddhist Discourses on the Venerable Vangisa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1558/bsrv.v24i1.35
- The paper
- Mun-Keat, C. (2007). Comparison of the Pali and Chinese Versions of the Vangisa-thera Samyutta, a Collection of Early Buddhist Discourses on the Venerable Vangisa. Buddhist Studies Review. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v24i1.35