Cited by 72Mobile Learning in EducationEnglish Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Tracking Learner Usage of Mobile Phones for Language Learning Outside of the Classroom

Stockwell, Glenn·2013·CALICO Journal

Abstract

Mobile technologies have the potential to empower learners to work outside of the classroom with a freedom that is difficult to achieve with more traditional technologies such as desktop computers. Of these, it is the mobile phone that has attracted a good deal of attention in the language learning literature in recent years (e.g., Kennedy & Levy, 2008; Author, 2010) but questions remain as to whether this enthusiasm is shared by the learners themselves. Author (2008), for example, showed that learners who were given the option of using their mobile phone or a personal desktop computer (PC) for language learning tasks showed an overwhelming preference for the PC. The study investigates server logs of how fifty Japanese learners of English complete activities on both mobile and PC platforms, in terms of the amount of time spent using each platform, when and where learners engaged in the activities, and the effect of a “push mechanism” email they could opt to have sent on a daily basis. Results are discussed in terms of patterns of learner usage with both platforms, and suggestions for activity design to enhance learner engagement are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1558/cj.v30i0.118-136

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learning on a computer tends to be far more meticulously planned than mobile and tablet counterparts.

    “For instance, learning on a computer usually tends to be far more meticulously planned (Stockwell, 2013) than for its mobile and tablet counterparts”

    From When Do Learners Study? (2022) · cites this paper as Stockwell, 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • When Do Learners Study?

    Sher, V., Hatala, M., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2022.6697 · Cited by 12 · see citing works

    “For instance, learning on a computer usually tends to be far more meticulously planned (Stockwell, 2013) than for its mobile and tablet counterparts, or for an activity (such as assignments) that might require lesser distraction, which some might say can be introduced by the opportunistic use of mobile phones and tabl…”
    BackgroundInfluential

Authors
Stockwell, G.
Affiliations
Waseda University (JP)
Corresponding author
Stockwell, Glenn
Venue
CALICO Journal
Published
2013-06-12
Pages
118-136
ISSN
  • 0742-7778 (ISSN-L)
  • 2056-9017
OpenAlex
W2142529985
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7
FWCI
19.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CALICO Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
mobile devices, language learning outside the classroom, server logs, student engagement, activity design, Japanese learners of English

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review