Cited by 302Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesInfection Control in Healthcare

Investigation of the First Seven Reported Cases of Candida auris, a Globally Emerging Invasive, Multidrug-Resistant Fungus — United States, May 2013–August 2016

Open access
Vallabhaneni, Snigdha, Kallen, Alex, Tsay, Sharon, Chow, Nancy, Welsh, Rory, Kerins, Janna, Kemble, Sarah K., Pacilli, Massimo +26 more·2016·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

Candida auris, an emerging fungus that can cause invasive infections, is associated with high mortality and is often resistant to multiple antifungal drugs. C. auris was first described in 2009 after being isolated from external ear canal discharge of a patient in Japan (1). Since then, reports of C. auris infections, including bloodstream infections, have been published from several countries, including Colombia, India, Israel, Kenya, Kuwait, Pakistan, South Africa, South Korea, Venezuela, and the United Kingdom (2-7). To determine whether C. auris is present in the United States and to prepare for the possibility of transmission, CDC issued a clinical alert in June 2016 informing clinicians, laboratorians, infection control practitioners, and public health authorities about C. auris and requesting that C. auris cases be reported to state and local health departments and CDC (8). This report describes the first seven U.S. cases of C. auris infection reported to CDC as of August 31, 2016. Data from these cases suggest that transmission of C. auris might have occurred in U.S. health care facilities and demonstrate the need for attention to infection control measures to control the spread of this pathogen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544e1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These observations help explain C. auris's propensity for colonizing skin, persisting on hospital surfaces, and spreading efficiently in the hospital setting.

    “These observations help to explain this pathogen’s propensity for colonizing skin, persisting on hospital surfaces, and spreading efficiently in the hospital setting (4, 19).”

    From Candida auris Forms High-Burden Biofilms in Skin Niche Conditions and on Porcine Skin (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

    The main report (page unavailable in our copy) documents skin colonization weeks to months after infection and C. auris on multiple surfaces in one hospital room. It says these findings suggest spread in health care settings is possible, but transmission was not definitively documented; it does not establish how long the organism persisted on surfaces or that it spread efficiently. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • C. auris poses an emerging threat in the United States and worldwide because of high-level antifungal resistance and spread in health care facilities.

    “posing an emerging threat in the United States and worldwide because of high-level antifungal resistance and spread in health care facilities (67–69).”
  • U.S. isolates are closely related to those of South America and South Asia.

    “Because U.S. isolates are closely related to those of South America and South Asia, we used the genome sequenced South Asian clade CA 0387 (B8441) to compare with C. albicans (4, 30 – 32).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 302

Authors
Vallabhaneni, S., Kallen, A., Tsay, S., Chow, N., Welsh, R., Kerins, J., Kemble, S. K., Pacilli, M., Black, S. R., Landon, E., Ridgway, J., Palmore, T. N., Zelzany, A., Adams, E. H., Quinn, M., Chaturvedi, S., Greenko, J., Fernandez, R., Southwick, K., Furuya, E. Y., Calfee, D. P., Hamula, C., Patel, G., Barrett, P., MSD, Lafaro, P., Berkow, E. L., Moulton-Meissner, H., Noble-Wang, J., Fagan, R. P., Jackson, B. R., Lockhart, S. R., Litvintseva, A. P., & Chiller, T. M.
Corresponding author
Vallabhaneni, Snigdha
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2016-11-11
Volume
65
Issue
44
Pages
1234-1237
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W2547589532
Cited by
302
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 2
FWCI
43.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • New York State Department of Health
  • State of New Jersey Department of Health
  • Mount Sinai Health System
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
Candida auris, invasive fungal infections, multidrug resistance, antifungal resistance, bloodstream infection, emerging fungal pathogens, infection control, case surveillance, United States
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Humans, United States, Global Health, Fatal Outcome, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review