Cited by 163Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentReproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Missed opportunities for prevention of congenital syphilis—United States, 2018.

Open access
Kimball, Anne, Torrone, Elizabeth, Miele, Kathryn, Bachmann, Laura, Thorpe, Phoebe, Weinstock, Hillard, Bowen, Virginia·2020·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

Congenital syphilis is an infection with Treponema pallidum in an infant or fetus, acquired during pregnancy from a mother with untreated or inadequately treated syphilis. Congenital syphilis can cause miscarriage, stillbirth, or early infant death, and infected infants can experience lifelong physical and neurologic problems. Although timely identification and treatment of maternal syphilis during pregnancy can prevent congenital syphilis (1,2), the number of reported congenital syphilis cases in the United States increased 261% during 2013-2018, from 362 to 1,306. Among reported congenital syphilis cases during 2018, a total of 94 resulted in stillbirths or early infant deaths (3). Using 2018 national congenital syphilis surveillance data and a previously developed framework (4), CDC identified missed opportunities for congenital syphilis prevention. Nationally, the most commonly missed prevention opportunities were a lack of adequate maternal treatment despite the timely diagnosis of syphilis (30.7%) and a lack of timely prenatal care (28.2%), with variation by geographic region. Congenital syphilis prevention involves syphilis prevention for women and their partners and timely identification and treatment of pregnant women with syphilis. Preventing continued increases in congenital syphilis requires reducing barriers to family planning and prenatal care, ensuring syphilis screening at the first prenatal visit with rescreening at 28 weeks' gestation and at delivery, as indicated, and adequately treating pregnant women with syphilis (2). Congenital syphilis prevention strategies that implement tailored public health and health care interventions to address missed opportunities can have substantial public health impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm6922a1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal risk factors for syphilis during pregnancy include sex with multiple partners, sex in conjunction with drug use or transactional sex, late entry to prenatal care or no prenatal care, methamphetamine or heroin use, incarceration of the woman or her partner, and unstable housing or homelessness.

    “Maternal risk factors for syphilis during pregnancy include sex with multiple partners, sex in conjunction with drug use or transactional sex, late entry to prenatal care (i.e., first visit during the second trimester or later) or no prenatal care, methamphetamine or heroin use, incarceration of the woman or her partner, and unstable housing or homelessness (174,633–636).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [636]

    The Discussion (page not specified) identifies lack of timely prenatal care as a missed opportunity to prevent congenital syphilis and reports homelessness, substance abuse, and incarceration as barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment. It does not identify these as risk factors for acquiring syphilis during pregnancy or address multiple partners, transactional sex, specific drugs, or a partner’s incarceration. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 163

Authors
Kimball, A., Torrone, E., Miele, K., Bachmann, L., Thorpe, P., Weinstock, H., & Bowen, V.
Affiliations
National Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Kimball, Anne
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2020-06-05
Volume
69
Issue
22
Pages
661-665
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W3033857534
Cited by
163
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 5
FWCI
14.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
congenital syphilis, missed opportunities for prevention, maternal syphilis, prenatal care, prenatal syphilis screening, syphilis treatment in pregnancy, Treponema pallidum, stillbirth, infant mortality, family planning, regional variation
MeSH terms
Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Syphilis, Syphilis, Congenital, United States, Early Diagnosis, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review