Cited by 614COVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCOVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing

Timing of State and Territorial COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders and Changes in Population Movement — United States, March 1–May 31, 2020

Open access
Moreland, Amanda, Herlihy, Christine, Tynan, Michael A., Sunshine, Gregory, McCord, Russell F., Hilton, Charity, Poovey, Jason, Werner, Angela K. +23 more·2020·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is thought to spread from person to person primarily by the respiratory route and mainly through close contact (1). Community mitigation strategies can lower the risk for disease transmission by limiting or preventing person-to-person interactions (2). U.S. states and territories began implementing various community mitigation policies in March 2020. One widely implemented strategy was the issuance of orders requiring persons to stay home, resulting in decreased population movement in some jurisdictions (3). Each state or territory has authority to enact its own laws and policies to protect the public's health, and jurisdictions varied widely in the type and timing of orders issued related to stay-at-home requirements. To identify the broader impact of these stay-at-home orders, using publicly accessible, anonymized location data from mobile devices, CDC and the Georgia Tech Research Institute analyzed changes in population movement relative to stay-at-home orders issued during March 1-May 31, 2020, by all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and five U.S. territories.* During this period, 42 states and territories issued mandatory stay-at-home orders. When counties subject to mandatory state- and territory-issued stay-at-home orders were stratified along rural-urban categories, movement decreased significantly relative to the preorder baseline in all strata. Mandatory stay-at-home orders can help reduce activities associated with the spread of COVID-19, including population movement and close person-to-person contact outside the household.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935a2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]Lasry A, Kidder D, Hast M,; CDC Public Health Law Program; New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; Louisiana Department of Health; Public Health – Seattle & King County; San Francisco COVID-19 Response Team; Alameda County Public Health Department; San Mateo County Health Department; Marin County Division of Public Health. Timing of community mitigation and changes in reported COVID-19 and community mobility—four U.S. metropolitan areas, February 26–April 1, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69: 451– 7. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e2 32298245 PMC7755061 · DOI
  2. [6]Rosner B, Glynn RJ, Lee M-LT. The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data. Biometrics 2006; 62: 185– 92. 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00389.x 16542245 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [7]Czeisler MÉ, Tynan MA, Howard ME, Public attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs related to COVID-19, stay-at-home orders, nonessential business closures, and public health guidance—United States, New York City, and Los Angeles, May 5–12, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69: 751– 8. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6924e1 32555138 PMC7302477 · DOI
  4. [8]Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int J Surg 2020; 78: 185– 93. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018 32305533 PMC7162753 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreland, A., Herlihy, C., Tynan, M. A., Sunshine, G., McCord, R. F., Hilton, C., Poovey, J., Werner, A. K., Jones, C. D., Fulmer, E. B., Gundlapalli, A. V., Strosnider, H., Potvien, A., García, M. C., Honeycutt, S., Baldwin, G., Program, C. P. H. L., CDC COVID-19 Response Team, M. P. A. U., Program, C. P. H. L., Clodfelter, C., Howard-Williams, M., Jeong, G., Landsman, L., Shelburne, J., CDC COVID-19 Response Team, M. P. A. U., Brown, A., Cramer, R., Gilchrist, S., Hulkower, R., Limeres, A., & Popoola, A.
Corresponding author
Moreland, Amanda
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2020-09-04
Volume
69
Issue
35
Pages
1198-1203
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W3082599424
Cited by
614
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 180 · 2021: 168 · 2020: 14
FWCI
19.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Pennsylvania
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, stay-at-home orders, human mobility, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mobile device location data, urban-rural differences, public health policy
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Population Dynamics, Public Health, Time Factors, United States, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review