Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Among Residents of Two Skilled Nursing Facilities Experiencing COVID-19 Outbreaks — Connecticut, December 2020–February 2021
Open accessAbstract
Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs), particularly those in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), have experienced disproportionately high levels of COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality and were prioritized for early COVID-19 vaccination (1,2). However, this group was not included in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, and limited postauthorization vaccine effectiveness (VE) data are available for this critical population (3). It is not known how well COVID-19 vaccines protect SNF residents, who typically are more medically frail, are older, and have more underlying medical conditions than the general population (1). In addition, immunogenicity of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was found to be lower in adults aged 65-85 years than in younger adults (4). Through the CDC Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program, SNF residents and staff members in Connecticut began receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine on December 18, 2020 (5). Administration of the vaccine was conducted during several on-site pharmacy clinics. In late January 2021, the Connecticut Department of Public Health (CT DPH) identified two SNFs experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks among residents and staff members that occurred after each facility's first vaccination clinic. CT DPH, in partnership with CDC, performed electronic chart review in these facilities to obtain information on resident vaccination status and infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Partial vaccination, defined as the period from >14 days after the first dose through 7 days after the second dose, had an estimated effectiveness of 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 33%-79%) against SARS-CoV-2 infection (regardless of symptoms) among residents within these SNFs. This is similar to estimated effectiveness for a single dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in adults across a range of age groups in noncongregate settings (6) and suggests that to optimize vaccine impact among this population, high coverage with the complete 2-dose series should be recommended for SNF residents and staff members.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vaccine effectiveness is lower in individuals who received only the first dose compared with those who received the full vaccination regimen.
“Studies suggest that effectiveness of the vaccine is lower in individuals who received only the first dose compared with individuals who received the full vaccination regimen [16,17].”
From Age-dependent Immune Response to the Biontech/Pfizer BNT162b2 Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 135
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Walsh EE, Frenck RW Jr, Falsey AR, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2439-50. PMID:33053279 https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMoa2027906 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Britton, A., Jacobs Slifka, K. M., Edens, C., Nanduri, S. A., Bart, S. M., Shang, N., Harizaj, A., Armstrong, J., Xu, K., Ehrlich, H. Y., Soda, E., Derado, G., Verani, J. R., Schrag, S. J., Jernigan, J. A., Leung, V. H., & Parikh, S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Britton, Amadea
- Edens, Chris
- ORCID
- Venue
- MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
- Published
- 2021-03-19
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 396-401
- ISSN
- 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-861X
- PMC
- PMC7976620
- OpenAlex
- W3138229539
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 55
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- State of Connecticut Department of Public Health
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863, TL1TR001864)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, BNT162b2, skilled nursing facilities, long-term care facilities, COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 outbreak, partial vaccination
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccines, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Connecticut, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Skilled Nursing Facilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review