Cited by 120COVID-19 and healthcare impactsEmergency and Acute Care StudiesCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Update: COVID-19 pandemic–associated changes in emergency department visits—United States, December 2020–January 2021.

Open access
Adjemian, Jennifer, Hartnett, Kathleen P., Kite-Powell, Aaron, DeVies, Jourdan, Azondekon, Roseric, Radhakrishnan, Lakshmi, van Santen, Katharina L., Rodgers, Loren·2021·MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

During March 29-April 25, 2020, emergency department (ED) visits in the United States declined by 42% after the declaration of a national emergency for COVID-19 on March 13, 2020. Among children aged ≤10 years, ED visits declined by 72% compared with prepandemic levels (1). To assess the continued impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on EDs, CDC examined trends in visits since December 30, 2018, and compared the numbers and types of ED visits by patient demographic and geographic factors during a COVID-19 pandemic period (December 20, 2020-January 16, 2021) with a prepandemic period 1 year earlier (December 15, 2019-January 11, 2020). After an initial decline during March-April 2020 (1), ED visits increased through July 2020, but at levels below those during the previous year, until December 2020-January 2021 when visits again fell to 25% of prepandemic levels. During this time, among patients aged 0-4, 5-11, 12-17, and ≥18 years, ED visits were lower by 66%, 63%, 38%, and 17%, respectively, compared with ED visits for each age group during the same period before the pandemic. Differences were also observed by region and reasons for ED visits during December 2020-January 2021; more visits during this period were for infectious diseases or mental and behavioral health-related concerns and fewer visits were for gastrointestinal and upper-respiratory-related illnesses compared with ED visits during December 2019-January 2020. Although the numbers of ED visits associated with socioeconomic factors and mental or behavioral health conditions are low, the increased visits by both adults and children for these concerns suggest that health care providers should maintain heightened vigilance in screening for factors that might warrant further treatment, guidance, or intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm7015a3

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE Weekly number of total,* adult,† and pediatric§ emergency department (ED) visits and COVID-19–like illness visits — National Syndromic Surveillance Program, United States,¶ December 30, 2018–January 16, 2021 * Total, adult, and pediatric visits include visits for COVID-19–like illness. † Patients aged ≥18 years. § Patients aged <18 years. ¶ Forty-six states and the District of Columbia. All facilities in Hawaii, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wyoming, and facilities in other states that started or stopped reporting to the National Syndromic Surveillance Program during 2019–2021 were excluded.
FIGURE Weekly number of total,* adult,† and pediatric§ emergency department (ED) visits and COVID-19–like illness visits — National Syndromic Surveillance Program, United States,¶ December 30, 2018–January 16, 2021 * Total, adult, and pediatric visits include visits for COVID-19–like illness. † Patients aged ≥18 years. § Patients aged <18 years. ¶ Forty-six states and the District of Columbia. All facilities in Hawaii, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wyoming, and facilities in other states that started or stopped reporting to the National Syndromic Surveillance Program during 2019–2021 were excluded.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Metadata

Authors
Adjemian, J., Hartnett, K. P., Kite-Powell, A., DeVies, J., Azondekon, R., Radhakrishnan, L., van Santen, K. L., & Rodgers, L.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
  • ICF International (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Adjemian, Jennifer
Venue
MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2021-04-16
Volume
70
Issue
15
Pages
552-556
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W3152793249
Cited by
120
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 20
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, emergency department visits, emergency department utilization, reasons for emergency visits, socioeconomic factors, children, adults
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, United States, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review