Cited by 44Education during COVID-19 pandemicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

COVID-19–Related School Closures and Learning Modality Changes — United States, August 1–September 17, 2021

Open access
Parks, Sharyn E., Zviedrite, Nicole, Budzyn, Samantha E., Panaggio, Mark J., Raible, Emma, Papazian, Marc, Magid, Jake, Ahmed, Faruque +2 more·2021·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

Beginning in January 2021, the U.S. government prioritized ensuring continuity of learning for all students during the COVID-19 pandemic (1). To estimate the extent of COVID-19-associated school disruptions, CDC and the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory used a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) (2) statistical approach to estimate the most likely actual learning modality based on patterns observed in past data, accounting for conflicting or missing information and systematic Internet searches (3) for COVID-19-related school closures. This information was used to assess how many U.S. schools were open, and in which learning modalities, during August 1-September 17, 2021. Learning modalities included 1) full in-person learning, 2) a hybrid of in-person and remote learning, and 3) full remote learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm7039e2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indirect benefits of vaccination include the likelihood of reduced transmission in the home and school settings, including transmission affecting vulnerable persons, and safer in-person learning.

    “Indirect benefits include the likelihood of reduced transmission in the home and in school settings, including transmission affecting vulnerable persons, and safer in-person learning.26-29”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 2 · Cited by 44

Authors
Parks, S. E., Zviedrite, N., Budzyn, S. E., Panaggio, M. J., Raible, E., Papazian, M., Magid, J., Ahmed, F., Uzicanin, A., & Barrios, L. C.
Affiliations
Booz Allen Hamilton (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Parks, Sharyn E.
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
70
Issue
39
Pages
1374-1376
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W3203876248
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, school closures, learning modalities, distance education, hybrid learning, in-person learning, school reopening, educational continuity, school attendance, United States
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Education, Humans, Schools, United States, Education, Distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review