The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dasymetric Mapping and Areal Interpolation: Implementation and Evaluation
Abstract
Dasymetric maps display statistical data in meaningful spatial zones. Such maps can be preferable to choropleth maps that show data by enumeration zones, because dasymetric zones more accurately represent underlying data distributions. Though dasymetric mapping has existed for well over a century, the methods for producing these maps have not been thoroughly examined. In contrast, research on areal interpolation has been more thorough and has examined methods of transferring data from one set of map zones to another, an issue that is applicable to dasymetric mapping. Inspired by this work, we tested five dasymetric mapping methods, including methods derived from work on areal interpolation. Dasymetric maps of six socio-economic variables were produced fm a study area of 159 counties in the eastern U.S. using county choropleth data and ancillary land-use data. Both polygonal (vector) and grid (raster) dasymetric methods were tested. We evaluated map accuracy using both statistical analyses and visual presentations of error. A repeated-measures analysis of variance showed that the traditional limiting variable method had significantly lower error than the other four methods. In addition, polygon methods had lower error than their grid-based counterparts, though the difference was not statistically significant. Error maps largely supported the conclusions from the statistical analysis, while also presenting patterns of error that were not obvious from the statistics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Land‐Use Dynamics Beyond the American Urban Fringe
Theobald, D. M. (2001) · Geographical Review · doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00240.x · Cited by 417
Mapping urban risk: Flood hazards, race, & environmental justice in New York
Maantay, J., & Maroko, A. (2009) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.08.002 · Cited by 283
Hibbert, J. D., Liese, A. D., Lawson, A., Porter, D. E., Puett, R. C., Standiford, D., Liu, L., & Dabelea, D. (2009) · International Journal of Health Geographics · doi:10.1186/1476-072x-8-54 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Eicher, C. L., & Brewer, C. A.
- Venue
- Cartography and Geographic Information Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-138
- ISSN
- 1523-0406 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-0465
- OpenAlex
- W1985725498
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dasymetric Mapping and Areal Interpolation: Implementation and Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1559/152304001782173727
- The paper
- Eicher, C. L., & Brewer, C. A. (2001). Dasymetric Mapping and Areal Interpolation: Implementation and Evaluation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304001782173727
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.