The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IMU Preintegration on Manifold for Efficient Visual-Inertial Maximum-a-Posteriori Estimation
Open accessAbstract
Recent results in monocular visual-inertial navigation (VIN) have shown that optimization-based approaches outperform filtering methods in terms of accuracy due to their capability to relinearize past states.However, the improvement comes at the cost of increased computational complexity.In this paper, we address this issue by preintegrating inertial measurements between selected keyframes.The preintegration allows us to accurately summarize hundreds of inertial measurements into a single relative motion constraint.Our first contribution is a preintegration theory that properly addresses the manifold structure of the rotation group and carefully deals with uncertainty propagation.The measurements are integrated in a local frame, which eliminates the need to repeat the integration when the linearization point changes while leaving the opportunity for belated bias corrections.The second contribution is to show that the preintegrated IMU model can be seamlessly integrated in a visual-inertial pipeline under the unifying framework of factor graphs.This enables the use of a structureless model for visual measurements, further accelerating the computation.The third contribution is an extensive evaluation of our monocular VIN pipeline: experimental results confirm that our system is very fast and demonstrates superior accuracy with respect to competitive state-of-the-art filtering and optimization algorithms, including off-the-shelf systems such as Google Tango [1].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parallel Tracking and Mapping for Small AR Workspaces
Klein, G., & Murray, D. (2007) · 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1109/ismar.2007.4538852 · Cited by 4,346
iSAM2: Incremental smoothing and mapping using the Bayes tree
Kaess, M., Johannsson, H., Roberts, R., Ila, V., Leonard, J. J., & Dellaert, F. (2012) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364911430419 · Cited by 1,362
Self-citationA Spline-Based Trajectory Representation for Sensor Fusion and Rolling Shutter Cameras
Patron-Perez, A., Lovegrove, S., & Sibley, G. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0811-3 · Cited by 104
Cited by
VINS-Mono: A Robust and Versatile Monocular Visual-Inertial State Estimator
Qin, T., Li, P., & Shen, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2018.2853729 · Cited by 4,669
On-Manifold Preintegration for Real-Time Visual--Inertial Odometry
Forster, C., Carlone, L., Dellaert, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2597321 · Cited by 1,502
Self-citation(2020) · doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196885 · Cited by 633
Dense RGB-D-inertial SLAM with map deformations
Laidlow, T., Bloesch, M., Li, W., & Leutenegger, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8206591 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Forster, C., Carlone, L., Dellaert, F., & Scaramuzza, D.
- Venue
- Robotics: Science and Systems XI
- Published
- 2015-07-13
- OpenAlex
- W2214788824
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 65.74
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.