The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Surfel-Based SLAM using 3D Laser Range Data in Urban Environments
Abstract
Accurate and reliable localization and mapping is a fundamental building block for most autonomous robots.For this purpose, we propose a novel, dense approach to laserbased mapping that operates on three-dimensional point clouds obtained from rotating laser sensors.We construct a surfel-based map and estimate the changes in the robot's pose by exploiting the projective data association between the current scan and a rendered model view from that surfel map.For detection and verification of a loop closure, we leverage the map representation to compose a virtual view of the map before a potential loop closure, which enables a more robust detection even with low overlap between the scan and the already mapped areas.Our approach is efficient and enables real-time capable registration.At the same time, it is able to detect loop closures and to perform map updates in an online fashion.Our experiments show that we are able to estimate globally consistent maps in large scale environments solely based on point cloud data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248074 · Cited by 14,897
Cited by
SemanticKITTI: A Dataset for Semantic Scene Understanding of LiDAR Sequences
Behley, J., Garbade, M., Milioto, A., Quenzel, J., Behnke, S., Stachniss, C., & Gall, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00939 · Cited by 2,294
Self-citationTightly Coupled 3D Lidar Inertial Odometry and Mapping
Ye, H., Chen, Y., & Liu, M. (2019) · 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2019.8793511 · Cited by 574
A Comparative Analysis of LiDAR SLAM-Based Indoor Navigation for Autonomous Vehicles
Zou, Q., Sun, Q., Chen, L., Nie, B., & Li, Q. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3063477 · Cited by 321
CT-ICP: Real-time Elastic LiDAR Odometry with Loop Closure
Dellenbach, P., Deschaud, J.-E., Jacquet, B., & Goulette, F. (2022) · 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9811849 · Cited by 280
Lic-fusion: Lidar-inertial-camera odometry
Zuo, X., Geneva, P., Lee, W., Liu, Y., & Huang, G. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros40897.2019.8967746 · Cited by 222
A Review of SLAM Techniques and Security in Autonomous Driving
Singandhupe, A., & La, H. M. (2019) · 2019 Third IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC) · doi:10.1109/irc.2019.00122 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Behley, J., & Stachniss, C.
- Venue
- Robotics: Science and Systems XIV
- Published
- 2018-06-26
- OpenAlex
- W2805521962
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 64.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.