The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Minimum Wages and Employment
Open accessAbstract
We review the burgeoning literature on the employment effects of minimum wages in the United States and other countries that was spurred by the new minimum wage research beginning in the early 1990s. Our review indicates that there is a wide range of existing estimates and, accordingly, a lack of consensus about the overall effects on low-wage employment of an increase in the minimum wage. However, the oft-stated assertion that recent research fails to support the traditional view that the minimum wage reduces the employment of low-wage workers is clearly incorrect. A sizable majority of the studies surveyed in this monograph give a relatively consistent (although not always statistically significant) indication of negative employment effects of minimum wages. In addition, among the papers we view as providing the most credible evidence, almost all point to negative employment effects, both for the United States as well as for many other countries. Two other important conclusions emerge from our review. First, we see very few if any studies that provide convincing evidence of positive employment effects of minimum wages, especially from those studies that focus on the broader groups (rather than a narrow industry) for which the competitive model predicts disemployment effects. Second, the studies that focus on the least-skilled groups provide relatively overwhelming evidence of stronger disemployment effects for these groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Numbers vs. Rights: Trade-Offs and Guest Worker Programs
Ruhs, M., & Martin, P. (2008) · International Migration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00120.x · Cited by 445
ALLEGRETTO, S. A., DUBE, A., & REICH, M. (2011) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.1468-232x.2011.00634.x · Cited by 379
Visualization, Identification, and Estimation in the Linear Panel Event-Study Design
Freyaldenhoven, S., Hansen, C., Pérez Pérez, J., & Shapiro, J. (2021) · doi:10.3386/w29170 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Neumark, D., & Wascher, W. L.
- Venue
- Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1–2
- Pages
- 1-182
- ISSN
- 1547-9846 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-9854
- OpenAlex
- W2156152815
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.