The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electoral Rules and Government Spending in Parliamentary Democracies
Abstract
We present a theoretical model of a parliamentary democracy where electoral competition inside coalition governments induces higher spending than under single party governments. Policy preferences of parties are endogenous and derived from opportunistic reelection motives. The electoral rule affects government spending, but only indirectly: proportional elections induce a more fragmented party system and a larger incidence of coalition governments than do majoritarian elections. Empirical evidence from post-war parliamentary democracies strongly supports these predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297968 · Cited by 33,272
Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy
Bucovetsky, S., Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2002) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061733 · Cited by 3,748
Self-citationWhy do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?
Rodrik, D. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250038 · Cited by 3,152
The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis
Cameron, D. R. (1978) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1954537 · Cited by 2,078
Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990
Lijphart, A. (1994) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198273479.001.0001 · Cited by 1,760
The Economic Effects of Constitutions
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2003) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2591.001.0001 · Cited by 1,676
Self-citationSeats and votes. The effects and determinants of electoral systems
Berg, S. (1990) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(90)90044-j · Cited by 1,627
Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies
(1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625671 · Cited by 1,395
IVERSEN, T., & SOSKICE, D. (2006) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055406062083 · Cited by 1,175
The Two-party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science
Riker, W. H. (1982) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400189580 · Cited by 995
Cited by
Political institutions, voter turnout, and policy outcomes
Fumagalli, E., & Narciso, G. (2012) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.10.002 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Persson, T., Roland, G., & Tabellini, G.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-05-15
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-188
- ISSN
- 1554-0626 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-0634
- OpenAlex
- W2889698073
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 106.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electoral Rules and Government Spending in Parliamentary Democracies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1561/100.00006019
- The paper
- Persson, T., Roland, G., & Tabellini, G. (2007). Electoral Rules and Government Spending in Parliamentary Democracies. Quarterly Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00006019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.