The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kernels for Vector-Valued Functions: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Kernel methods are among the most popular techniques in machine learning. From a regularization perspective they play a central role in regularization theory as they provide a natural choice for the hypotheses space and the regularization functional through the notion of reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. From a probabilistic perspective they are the key in the context of Gaussian processes, where the kernel function is known as the covariance function. Traditionally, kernel methods have been used in supervised learning problems with scalar outputs and indeed there has been a considerable amount of work devoted to designing and learning kernels. More recently there has been an increasing interest in methods that deal with multiple outputs, motivated partially by frameworks like multitask learning. In this monograph, we review different methods to design or learn valid kernel functions for multiple outputs, paying particular attention to the connection between probabilistic and functional methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Cited by
Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects
Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A., & Kim, C. (2017) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 · Cited by 1,945
Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyond
Muandet, K., Fukumizu, K., Sriperumbudur, B., & Schölkopf, B. (2017) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000060 · Cited by 409
Applied Stochastic Differential Equations
Särkkä, S., & Solin, A. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108186735 · Cited by 326
Brain-wide Electrical Spatiotemporal Dynamics Encode Depression Vulnerability
Hultman, R., Ulrich, K., Sachs, B. D., Blount, C., Carlson, D. E., Ndubuizu, N., Bagot, R. C., Parise, E. M., Vu, M.-A. T., Gallagher, N. M., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.012 · Cited by 183
Meta Reinforcement Learning with Latent Variable Gaussian Processes
Sæmundsson, S., Hofmann, K., & Deisenroth, M. P. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.07551 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Álvarez, M. A., Rosasco, L., & Lawrence, N. D.
- Venue
- Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-06-19
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-266
- ISSN
- 1935-8237 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-8245
- OpenAlex
- W2146611938
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.