The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minority languages in social media: A comparative European study of digital vitality
Open accessAbstract
This article explores how the role of media in supporting minority languages is evolving in response to the expanding digital media landscape in the EU. It examines how the use of minority languages in media is influenced by their status within the growing digital market. As digital media become more dominant in everyday life, minority languages are susceptible to negative shifts, particularly with the rise of internet-based platforms. Through the analysis of four minority language secessionist movements (Scottish Gaelic, Provençal, Andalusian, and Silesian), the article examines whether each context can still support minority languages institutionally in their respective media landscape, and what conditions are necessary for that support. It also questions how EU policies aimed at protecting and promoting these languages can remain effective if they aren’t adapted to fit the new digital realities. The significance of the study thus stems from its direct comparative approach and its comprehensive update of existing academic literature, assessing the changes that took place across the four media systems. The results showed an asymmetrical growth of traditional outlets as opposed to digital ones among all communities, owing largely to a lack of public policy initiatives within the free-market digital space and subsequent algorithmic prioritisation of majority languages. The article thus calls for a synthesis of top-down policy initiatives with bottom-up grassroots movements to enhance and develop new media services in minority languages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kornai, A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077056 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Nowakowski, M.
- Affiliations
- Jagiellonian University (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Nowakowski, Maciej
- ORCID
- Nowakowski, Maciej
- Venue
- Social Communication Ethics
- Published
- 2026-03-31
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-70
- ISSN
- 3071-9836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7163158560
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Social Communication Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Minority Rights and Languages
- Keywords
- minority languages, digital media, language vitality, language policy, separatist movements, Scottish Gaelic, Provençal, Andalusians, Silesians, European Union language policy, media systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minority languages in social media: A comparative European study of digital vitality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15633/10.15633/sce.02103
- The paper
- Nowakowski, M. (2026). Minority languages in social media: A comparative European study of digital vitality. Social Communication Ethics. https://doi.org/10.15633/10.15633/sce.02103