Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 45Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A scoping review of simulation-based dental education

Open access

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. In order to meet the needs of student learning within a competency-based pedagogy, it is necessary to understand the current philosophies and modalities being used in dental and oral health simulation-based education. The aim of this literature review is to identify the existing research relating to the educational structure of dental and oral health simulation activities. The review is presented as a scoping review, formulated and conducted using a modified five stage methodological framework. Despite evidence showing that the healthcare simulation model is ideal for learning and assessments of non-clinical and clinical tasks such as psychomotor skills, there is a paucity of published literature relating to simulation in dental and oral health education. Out of 72 initial articles only six papers related to dental preclinical psychomotor skills in an educational setting, none of which were deemed high-quality. Deficiencies in these papers included no statements defining underpinning educational theory, limited acknowledgement of evidence-based simulation activities including preparation, briefing, simulation, feedback, debriefing, reflection and evaluation. Given the widespread use of simulation in dentistry, academics should be encouraged to publish their scholarly activities in simulation-based dental education in order so that all dental faculties can work towards developing contemporary simulation curriculum to provide optimum teaching and learning opportunities for students.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15694/mep.2020.000036.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchartCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Amer R. S. Denehy G. E. Cobb D. S. Dawson D. V. (2011) Development and evaluation of an Interactive Dental Video Game to Teach Dentin Bonding. Journal of Dental Education. 75(6), pp. 823– 831. 21642529
  2. Arigbede A. Denloye O. and Dosumu O. (2015) Use of simulators in operative dental education: experience in southern Nigeria. African Health Sciences. 15(1), pp. 269– 277. 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.35 25834558 PMC4370126 · DOI
  3. Arksey H. and O’Malley L. (2007) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal Of Social Research Methodology. 8(1), pp. 19– 32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ben-Gal G. Weiss E. I. Gafni N. and Ziv A. (2013) Testing manual dexterity using a virtual reality simulator: reliability and validity. European Journal of Dental Education. 17, pp. 138– 142. 10.1111/eje.12023 23815690 · DOI
  5. Cheng A. Kessler D. Mackinnon R. Chang T. P. (2016) Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Advances in Simulation. 1(25), pp. 1– 13. 10.1186/s41077-016-0025-y 29449994 PMC5806464 · DOI
  6. Fugill M. (2013) Defining the purpose of phantom head. European Journal of Dental Education. 17, pp. e1– e4. 10.1111/eje.12008 23279394 · DOI
  7. Gaba D. M. (2004) The future vision of simulation in health care. BMJ Quality & Safety. 13(1). 10.1136/qshc.2004.009878 PMC1765792 15465951 · DOI
  8. Gottlieb R. Lanning S. K. Gunsolley J. C. and Buchanan J. A. (2011) Faculty Impressions of Dental Students. Performance With and Without Virtual Reality Simulation. Journal of Dental Education. 75(11), pp. 1443– 1451. 22058393
  9. Kilistoff A. J. Mackenzie L. D’Eon M. and Trinder K. (2013) Efficacy of a Step-by-Step Carving Technique for Dental Students. Journal of Dental Education. 77(1), pp. 63– 67. 23314467
  10. Laschinger S. Medves J. Pulling C. McGraw D. R. (2008) Effectiveness of simulation on health profession students’ knowledge, skills, confidence and satisfaction. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews. 6(7), pp. 265– 309. 10.11124/jbisrir-2008-223 27819835 · DOI
  11. Levac D. Colquhoun H. and O’Brien K. K. (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 5(69), pp. 1– 9. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 20854677 PMC2954944 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Levett-Jones T. and Lapkin S. (2014) A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education. Nurse Education Today. 34(6), pp. e58– e63. 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.020 24169444 · DOI
  13. Levine A. I. DeMaria S. Schwartz A. D. and Sim A. J. (eds.) (2014) The Comprehensive Textbook of Healthcare Simulation. 2nd edn. New York: Springer.
  14. Perry S. Bridges S. M. and Burrow M. F. (2015) A Review of the Use of Simulation in Dental Education. Simulation in Healthcare. 10(1), pp. 31– 37. 10.1097/sih.0000000000000059 25574865 · DOI
  15. Reese C. E. Jeffries P. R. and Engum S. A. (2010) Learning Together: Using Simulations to Develop Nursing and Medical Student Collaboration. Nursing Education Perspectives. 31(1), pp. 33– 38. 20397478
  16. Schaefer J. J. Vanderbilt A. A. Cason C. L. Bauman E. B. (2011) Instructional Design and Pedagogy Science in Healthcare Simulation. Simulation in Healthcare. 6, pp. S30– S41. 10.1097/sih.0b013e31822237b4 21817861 · DOI
  17. Seropian M. A. Brown K. Gavilanes J. S. and B D. (2004) An Approach to Simulation Program Development. Journal of Nursing Education. 43(4), pp. 170– 175. 15098911
  18. Shah R. and Cunningham S. (2009) Implementation of the virtual learning environment into a UK orthodontic training programme: the postgraduate and lecturer perspective. European Journal of Dental Education. 13(4), pp. 223– 232. 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2009.00579.x 19824959 · DOI
  19. Urbankova A. Eber M. and Engebretson S. P. (2013) A Complex Haptic Exercise to Predict Preclinical Operative Dentistry Performance: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Dental Education. 77(11), pp. 1443– 1450. 24192409
  20. Urbankova A. and Engebretson S. P. (2011a) Computer-Assisted Dental Simulation as a Predictor of Preclinical Operative Dentistry Perfomance. Journal of Dental Education. 75(9), pp. 1249– 1255. 21890855
  21. Urbankova A. and Engebretson S. P. (2011b) The Use of Haptics to Predict Preclinic Operative Dentistry Performance and Perceptual Ability. Journal of Dental Education. 75(12), pp. 1548– 1557. 22184593
  22. Walker J. and von Bergmann H. (2015) Lessons from a Pilot Project in Cognitive Task Analysis: The Potential Role of Intermediates in Preclinical Teaching in Dental Education. Journal of Dental Education. 79(3), pp. 286– 294. 25729022
  23. Watson K. Wright A. Morris N. McMeeken J. (2012) Can simulation replace part of clinical time? Two parallel randomised controlled trials. Medical Education. 46, pp. 657– 667. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04295.x 22646319 · DOI
  24. Welk A. Maggio M. Simon J. Scarbecz M. (2008) Computer-assisted Learning and Simulation Lab with 40 DentSim Units. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 11, pp. 17– 40. 18780559
  25. Weller J. M. Nestel D. Marshall S. D. Brooks P. M. (2012) Simulation in clinical teaching and learning. Medical Education. 196(9), pp. 1– 5. 10.5694/mja10.11474 22621154 · DOI
  26. Wierinck E. R. Puttemans V. Swinnen S. P. and Steenberghe D. v. (2007) Expert Performance on a Virtual Reality Simulation System. Journal of Dental Education. 71(6), pp. 759– 766. 17554093
  27. Williams B. and Song J. J. Y. (2016) Are simulated patients effective in facilitating development of clinical competence for healthcare students? A scoping review. Advances in Simulation. 1(6), pp. 1– 9. 10.1186/s41077-016-0006-1 29449975 PMC5796606 · DOI

Cited by

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Higgins, D., Hayes, M., Taylor, J., & Wallace, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Hayes, Melanie
Venue
MedEdPublish
Published
2020-02-27
Volume
9
Pages
36
ISSN
2312-7996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008717849
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MedEdPublish (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
dental education, oral health education, competency-based education, psychomotor skills, simulation curriculum, debriefing, feedback, simulation evaluation, dental students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.