Pre-college summer program in entrepreneurial and design thinking influences STEM success for African American students
Open accessAbstract
Sustained innovation and economic strength of the U.S depends on a greater participation of underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). University-based outreach programs that serve African American and other minority populations should do more to infuse invention education in activities that engage pre-college students from these groups to motivate them to pursue STEM degrees. The Research, Discovery, and Innovation (RDI) Summer Institute is a design and science entrepreneurship program that is offered at North Carolina Central University to high school seniors who have been accepted for admission to a STEM degree program at the university. This study found the RDI Summer Institute program to be effective based on proximal outcomes of gains in composite entrepreneurial thinking skills (entrepreneurial, managerial, engineering design, and technical skills) as perceived by the participants and measured by pre- and post-surveys. Eighty-seven percent of the pre-college participants were African Americans, showed high levels of creativity and innovativeness, and presented product ideas that were conscientious in meeting their community needs. Program impact was assessed based on near-term and distal academic outcomes in college through a rigorously designed quasi-experiment which compared 31 case-control matched pairs of students who had been RDI participants and non-RDI participants. A conditional logistic regression showed first-year retention in STEM degree programs for students who had been RDI participants was five times that of students who had been non-RDI participants. Additionally, first-year STEM retention in differential comparisons favored female students, students from very low/low SES households, and students from single parent households. Also, students who had been RDI participants performed higher in STEM gatekeeper courses, and a strong positive impact of the RDI Summer Institute program was associated with higher STEM persistence even two and three years after pre-college students participated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jackson et al. (2024) reported positive effects on retention and academic performance in courses, especially among women.
“one reported positive effects on retention and academic performance in courses, especially among women (Jackson et al., 2024)”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Jackson et al., 2024
Wischusen and Wischusen (2007) and Jackson et al. (2024) considered high school GPA, ACT or SAT scores, major, and gender.
“Wischusen and Wischusen (2007) and Jackson et al. (2024) also considered high school GPA, ACT or SAT scores, major, and gender.”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Jackson et al. (2024)
Cites
Ashley, M., Cooper, K. M., Cala, J. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-05-0085 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review
Caballero Díaz, D., Amin, A., Musa, P., & Leung, V. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020220
- Authors
- Jackson, C. R., Whittington, D., & Bradley, T.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina Central University (US)
- Strategic Evaluations, Inc.
- Venue
- The Journal of STEM Outreach
- Publisher
- Vanderbilt University Library
- Published
- 2024-02-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2576-6767 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391649145
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The Journal of STEM Outreach (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1719519, 1238547, 1818706)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- design thinking, entrepreneurial spirit, STEM persistence, African American students, underrepresented minorities in STEM, university outreach programs, STEM retention, high school students, socioeconomic status, single-parent families, gender differences in STEM
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review