Cited by 3Career Development and DiversityHigher Education Research StudiesEngineering Education and Pedagogy

Pre-college summer program in entrepreneurial and design thinking influences STEM success for African American students

Open access
Jackson, Caesar R., Whittington, Dawayne, Bradley, Tanina·2024·The Journal of STEM Outreach

Abstract

Sustained innovation and economic strength of the U.S depends on a greater participation of underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). University-based outreach programs that serve African American and other minority populations should do more to infuse invention education in activities that engage pre-college students from these groups to motivate them to pursue STEM degrees. The Research, Discovery, and Innovation (RDI) Summer Institute is a design and science entrepreneurship program that is offered at North Carolina Central University to high school seniors who have been accepted for admission to a STEM degree program at the university. This study found the RDI Summer Institute program to be effective based on proximal outcomes of gains in composite entrepreneurial thinking skills (entrepreneurial, managerial, engineering design, and technical skills) as perceived by the participants and measured by pre- and post-surveys. Eighty-seven percent of the pre-college participants were African Americans, showed high levels of creativity and innovativeness, and presented product ideas that were conscientious in meeting their community needs. Program impact was assessed based on near-term and distal academic outcomes in college through a rigorously designed quasi-experiment which compared 31 case-control matched pairs of students who had been RDI participants and non-RDI participants. A conditional logistic regression showed first-year retention in STEM degree programs for students who had been RDI participants was five times that of students who had been non-RDI participants. Additionally, first-year STEM retention in differential comparisons favored female students, students from very low/low SES households, and students from single parent households. Also, students who had been RDI participants performed higher in STEM gatekeeper courses, and a strong positive impact of the RDI Summer Institute program was associated with higher STEM persistence even two and three years after pre-college students participated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15695/jstem/v7i2.03

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, C. R., Whittington, D., & Bradley, T.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina Central University (US)
  • Strategic Evaluations, Inc.
Venue
The Journal of STEM Outreach
Published
2024-02-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
ISSN
2576-6767 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391649145
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
The Journal of STEM Outreach (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1719519, 1238547, 1818706)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
design thinking, entrepreneurial spirit, STEM persistence, African American students, underrepresented minorities in STEM, university outreach programs, STEM retention, high school students, socioeconomic status, single-parent families, gender differences in STEM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review