Cited by 14Science Education and PedagogyScience and Education ResearchEducational Theory and Curriculum Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Student teachers’ views: what is an interesting Life Sciences curriculum?

Open access
de Villiers, Rian·2011·South African Journal of Education

Abstract

In South Africa, the Grade 12 'classes of 2008 and 2009' were the first to write examinations under the revised Life Sciences (Biology) curriculum which focuses on outcomes-based education (OBE). This paper presents an exploration of what students (as learners) considered to be difficult and interesting in Grades 10-12 Life Sciences curricula in the Further Education and Training (FET) phase. A sample of 125 first year, pre-service Life Sciences and Natural Sciences teachers from a university responded to a questionnaire in regard to their experiences with the newly implemented FET Life Sciences curricula. The responses to the questions were analysed qualitatively and/or quantitatively. Friedman tests were used to compare the mean rankings of the four different content knowledge areas within each curriculum, and to make cross-curricular comparisons of the mean rankings of the same content knowledge area for all three curricula. All four content areas of Grade 12 were considered as being more interesting than the other two grades. In terms of difficulty, the students found the Grade 10 curriculum themes the most difficult, followed by the Grade 12 and the Grade 11 curricula. Most of the students found the themes under the content area Diversity, change and continuity (Grades 10-12) more difficult to learn than the other three content areas. It is recommended that more emphasis needs to be placed on what learners are interested in, and on having this incorporated into Life Sciences curricula.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15700/saje.v31n4a403

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
de Villiers, R.
Affiliations
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
de Villiers, Rian
Venue
South African Journal of Education
Published
2011-11-23
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
535-548
ISSN
  • 0256-0100 (ISSN-L)
  • 2076-3433
OpenAlex
W2152561769
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • South African Journal of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Keywords
life science curriculum, student perceptions, pre-service teachers, outcome-based education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review