Cited by 5Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesGender, Feminism, and Media

The Effects of Instagram Influencers and Appearance Comparisons on Body Appreciation, Internalization of Beauty Ideals and Self Esteem in Women

Open access
Bauer, Juliane·2020

Abstract

The current study investigated how exposure to thin bodies on different (social) media platforms affect body appreciation, internalization of beauty ideals, and self-esteem in female and non-binary participants. The participants (N=116) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: exposure to content from a) Instagram influencers, b) models in magazines, or c) peers. Participants completed an online survey, answering questions about their feelings towards the women depicted in the media content as well as appearance comparison tendencies, body appreciation, self-esteem, internalization of body ideals, and BMI. Overall, significant differences between groups were found for the internalization of body ideals and how attainable participants believed the body of the depicted women to be. No significant differences between conditions were found for self-esteem, appearance comparisons, or body appreciation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15760/honors.929

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media bloggers and influencers were found to be more relatable to women under study than traditional models.

    “Social media bloggers and influencers were found to be more relatable to women understudy than traditional models.”

    From How False Social Media Beauty Standards Lead To Body Dysmorphia (2023) · cites this paper as Bauer, 2020

    The introduction (page unavailable) describes influencers as more relatable than traditional models, and the Appearance Comparison results report that participants compared themselves with influencers more often than with magazine models. But the study did not establish that its participants found influencers more relatable: its Experimental Condition results found no significant difference in perceived appearance attainability between the influencer and magazine-model groups. The claim presents the introductory idea as a finding about the women studied. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Women suffering from low self-esteem after spending hours on social media sites reported having a greater desire to look like influencers.

    “The study found that women, suffering from low self-esteem after spending hours on social media sites, reported having a greater desire to look like influencers.”

    From How False Social Media Beauty Standards Lead To Body Dysmorphia (2023) · cites this paper as Bauer, 2020

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that participants with lower self-esteem had a greater desire to look like the women depicted in the study images. It does not establish that spending hours on social media caused their low self-esteem, and the images included peers and models as well as influencers. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Women internalized the thin ideal after being exposed to social media sites.

    “Women also internalized the thin ideal after being exposed to social media sites.”

    From How False Social Media Beauty Standards Lead To Body Dysmorphia (2023) · cites this paper as Bauer, 2020

    The Internalization of Body Ideals results (page unavailable) report higher internalization scores among participants who spent more time on social media, and the study measured internalization after exposure to images. But this association does not show that exposure caused women to internalize the thin ideal; internalization did not differ significantly between the Instagram-influencer group and either comparison group. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Abidin, C. (2016). "Aren't these just young, rich women doing vain things online?": Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media Society, 2(2), Social Media Society, 07 April 2016, Vol.2(2).
  2. Avalos, L., Tylka, T., & Wood-Barcalow, N. (2005). The body appreciation scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Body Image, 2(3), 285-297.
  3. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265-299.
  4. Bearman, S., Martinez, K., Stice, E., & Presnell, K. (2006). The skinny on body dissatisfaction: A longitudinal study of adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(2), 217-229.
  5. Carey, R., Donaghue, N., & Broderick, N. (2013). Peer culture and body image concern among australian adolescent girls: A hierarchical linear modelling analysis. Sex Roles, 69(5-6), 250-263.
  6. Chae, J. (2018). Explaining females' envy toward social media influencers. Media Psychology, 21(2), 246-262.
  7. Cohen, R., Fardouly, J., Newton-John, T., & Slater, A. (2019). #BoPo on Instagram: An experimental investigation of the effects of viewing body positive content on young women's mood and body image. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1546-1564.
  8. Fardouly, J., Willburger, B., & Vartanian, L. (2018). Instagram use and young women's body image concerns and self-objectification: Testing mediational pathways. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1380-1395.
  9. Fardouly, J., & Vartanian, L. (2015). Negative comparisons about one's appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns. Body Image, 12(1), 82- 88.
  10. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
  11. Grabe, S., Ward, L., & Hyde, J. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460-476.
  12. Holland, G., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body Image, 17, 100- 110.
  13. Instagram. (2019). Our story. Retrieved from https://instagram-press.com/our-story/
  14. Kimbrough, A., Guadagno, R., Muscanell, N., & Dill, J. (2013). Gender differences in mediated communication: Women connect more than do men. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 896-900.
  15. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 490- 516). New York, NY: Routledge.
  16. Marwick, A. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture: Bulletin of the Project for Transnational Cultural Studies., 27(1), 137-160.
  17. O'Connell, M. (2012). Don't act, don't tell: Discrimination based on gender nonconformity in the entertainment industry and the clinical setting. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 16(3), 241-255.
  18. O'brien, K., Caputi, P., Minto, R., Peoples, G., Hooper, C., Kell, S., & Sawley, E. (2009). Upward and downward physical appearance comparisons: Development of scales and examination of predictive qualities. Body Image, 6(3), 201-206.
  19. Reaves, S., Hitchon, J.H., Park, S., & Yun, G.W. (2004). If looks could kill: Digital manipulation of fashion models. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 19(1), 56-71.
  20. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  21. Schaefer, L., Burke, N., Thompson, J., Dedrick, R., Heinberg, L., Calogero, R., . . . Swami, V. (2015). Development and validation of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4). Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 54-67.
  22. Tiggemann, M. (2005). Television and adolescent body image: The role of program content and viewing motivation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(3), 361-381.
  23. Tiggemann, M., & Polivy, J. (2010). Upward and downward: Social comparison processing of thin idealized media images. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(3), 356-364.
  24. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2014). NetTweens: The internet and body image concerns in preteenage girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(5), 606-620.
  25. Thompson, J.K., Van den Berg, P., Roehrig, M., Guarda, A., & Heinberg, L. (2004). The sociocultural attitudes towards appearance scale-3 (SATAQ-3): Development and validation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35(3), 293-304.
  26. Vartanian, L., & Dey, S. (2013). Self-concept clarity, thin-ideal internalization, and appearance- related social comparison as predictors of body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 10(4), 495- 500.
  27. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245-271.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, J.
Affiliations
Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bauer, Juliane
Published
2020-05-22
OpenAlex
W3039387433
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
Locations
PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
Instagram influencers, appearance comparison, body appreciation, self-esteem, thin ideal, social media exposure, peer comparison, women, body image

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review