Cited by 8Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Social Media: Social Intelligence Training Module

Open access
Robertson, Morgan, Shoss, Mindy K., Broom, Matthew A.·2016·MedEdPORTAL

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Physicians' posts on social media have the potential to impact the patient-physician relationship, interpersonal relationships at work, institutions' reputations, and the public's trust in health care professionals. Empirical research, along with several very public cases of unprofessional behavior by physicians on social media, suggests that resident physicians are not always aware of the implications of their actions online. Residency programs are being charged with ways to model positive online presence. The goal of this project was to develop a social media training program that emphasized perspective taking and fostered appropriate social media use. METHODS: This training program involves an interactive lecture and discussion, with approximately 20 minutes of content, 20 minutes of small-group discussion, and 10 minutes of large-group discussion. We evaluated the effectiveness of this program by asking participants to complete presession and postsession surveys of social media knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. RESULTS: = 16) suggest that the social media training program was successful. Participants demonstrated an increase in knowledge of social media policies, ability to identify potentially inappropriate media interactions, ability to identify appropriate responses to such interactions, and understanding of how their actions on social media affect others. DISCUSSION: We believe that the social media module is an effective and useful tool for members of the medical community as the internet and social media continue to grow in popularity and lines between professional and personal realms are continually blurred. While the effectiveness of this program was established with first-year pediatric residents, the module material is applicable to a broader medical audience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10442

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]American Medical Association. Opinion 9.124—professionalism in the use of social media. AMA J Ethics. 2015; 17(5): 432– 433.

Authors
Robertson, M., Shoss, M. K., & Broom, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Saint Louis University (ES)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Robertson, Morgan
Venue
MedEdPORTAL
Published
2016-08-26
Volume
12
Pages
10442-10442
ISSN
2374-8265 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2508498816
Cited by
8
References
11
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MedEdPORTAL (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social media, physician professionalism, social intelligence, perspective taking, medical residents, online professional conduct, pediatric residency, physician-patient relationship, institutional reputation, trust in healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review