Cited by 67Military Strategy and TechnologyInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyMilitary Technology and Strategies

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power (May 2018)

Open access
Horowitz, Michael C.·2018·Texas National Security Review

Abstract

World leaders, CEOs, and academics have suggested that a revolution in artificial intelligence is upon us. Are they right, and what will advances in artificial intelligence mean for international competition and the balance of power? This article evaluates how developments in artificial intelligence (AI) — advanced, narrow applications in particular — are poised to influence military power and international politics. It describes how AI more closely resembles “enabling” technologies such as the combustion engine or electricity than a specific weapon. AI’s still-emerging developments make it harder to assess than many technological changes, especially since many of the organizational decisions about the adoption and uses of new technology that generally shape the impact of that technology are in their infancy. The article then explores the possibility that key drivers of AI development in the private sector could cause the rapid diffusion of military applications of AI, limiting first-mover advantages for innovators. Alternatively, given uncertainty about the technological trajectory of AI, it is also possible that military uses of AI will be harder to develop based on private-sector AI technologies than many expect, generating more potential first-mover advantages for existing powers such as China and the United States, as well as larger consequences for relative power if a country fails to adapt. Finally, the article discusses the extent to which U.S. military rhetoric about…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.15781/t2639kp49

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approaches to studying AI in international politics include using research on military innovation, Offense-Defense theory, and strategic stability.

    “Approaches include using research on military innovation (Horowitz 2018), Offense-Defense theory (Garfinkel & Dafoe 2019), and strategic stability (Altmann & Sauer 2017, Horowitz et al. 2019), among others.”

    From Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? (2020) · cites this paper as Horowitz 2018

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Horowitz, M. C.
Corresponding author
Horowitz, Michael C.
Venue
Texas National Security Review
Publisher
Texas National Security Review
Published
2018
OpenAlex
W2894637789
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Military Technology and Strategies
Keywords
artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence in warfare, balance of power, international competition, first-mover advantage, technology diffusion, enabling technologies, relative power, international politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review