The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power (May 2018)
Open accessAbstract
World leaders, CEOs, and academics have suggested that a revolution in artificial intelligence is upon us. Are they right, and what will advances in artificial intelligence mean for international competition and the balance of power? This article evaluates how developments in artificial intelligence (AI) — advanced, narrow applications in particular — are poised to influence military power and international politics. It describes how AI more closely resembles “enabling” technologies such as the combustion engine or electricity than a specific weapon. AI’s still-emerging developments make it harder to assess than many technological changes, especially since many of the organizational decisions about the adoption and uses of new technology that generally shape the impact of that technology are in their infancy. The article then explores the possibility that key drivers of AI development in the private sector could cause the rapid diffusion of military applications of AI, limiting first-mover advantages for innovators. Alternatively, given uncertainty about the technological trajectory of AI, it is also possible that military uses of AI will be harder to develop based on private-sector AI technologies than many expect, generating more potential first-mover advantages for existing powers such as China and the United States, as well as larger consequences for relative power if a country fails to adapt. Finally, the article discusses the extent to which U.S. military rhetoric about…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Approaches to studying AI in international politics include using research on military innovation, Offense-Defense theory, and strategic stability.
“Approaches include using research on military innovation (Horowitz 2018), Offense-Defense theory (Garfinkel & Dafoe 2019), and strategic stability (Altmann & Sauer 2017, Horowitz et al. 2019), among others.”
From Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? (2020) · cites this paper as Horowitz 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics?
Horowitz, M. C. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032725 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Horowitz, M. C.
- Corresponding author
- Horowitz, Michael C.
- ORCID
- Horowitz, Michael C.
- Venue
- Texas National Security Review
- Publisher
- Texas National Security Review
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W2894637789
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Military Technology and Strategies
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence in warfare, balance of power, international competition, first-mover advantage, technology diffusion, enabling technologies, relative power, international politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review