Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Globalization and Multi-spatial Trends in the Coverage of Protected-Area Conservation (1980–2000)

Zimmerer, Karl S., Galt, Ryan E., Buck, Margaret V.·2004·AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment

Abstract

This study is focused on the global expansion of protected-area coverage that occurred during the 1980--2000 period. We examine the multi-scale patterning of four of the basic facets of this expansion: i) estimated increases at the world-regional and country-level scales of total protected-area coverage; ii) transboundary protected areas; iii) conservation corridor projects; and iv) type of conservation management. Geospatial patterning of protected-area designations is a reflection of the priorities of global conservation organizations and the globalization of post-Cold War political and economic arrangements. Local and national-level factors (political leadership and infrastructure) as well as international relations such as multilateral and bilateral aid combine with these globalization processes to impact the extent, type, and location of protected-area designations. We conclude that the interaction of these factors led to the creation and reinforcement of marked spatial differences (rather than tendencies toward worldwide evenness or homogenization) in the course of protected-area expansion during the 1980--2000 period.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1579/0044-7447-33.8.520

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been a recent conservation boom with unprecedented increases in the land area designated for conservation.

    “Many have noted the recent conservation boom, with unprecedented increases in the land area designated for conservation (see Zimmerer et al., 2004).”

    From Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation (2015) · cites this paper as Zimmerer et al., 2004

  • Linking conservation goals to specific territories finds expression in an expanding map of protected areas.

    “The linking of conservation goals to specific territories (mapping for conservation) is a practice that finds expression in an expanding map of protected areas (Zimmerer et al., 2004; see Map 1 and Box 1).”

    From Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation (2015) · cites this paper as Zimmerer et al., 2004

  • Most protected areas remain limited to the confines of just one political state, although the number of transboundary protected areas is on the rise.

    “As a result, most protected areas remain limited to the confines of just one political state, although the number of 'transboundary protected areas' is on the rise (Zimmerer et al., 2004).”

    From Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation (2015) · cites this paper as Zimmerer et al., 2004

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zimmerer, K. S., Galt, R. E., & Buck, M. V.
Venue
AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment
Published
2004-12
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
520-529
ISSN
0044-7447
Cited by
116
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review