Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7Philosophical Thought and AnalysisPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryPhilosophy, Sociology, Political Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ANTHROPOLOGICAL AND AXIOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON SOCIETY’S SELF-ORGANIZATION

Open access
Hoian, I. M., Budz, V. P.·2020·Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research

Abstract

Purpose. The paper aimed at analyzing the anthropological and axiological dimensions of human social expectations in the aspect of the self-organization processes of social phenomena and revealing their essence. Theoretical basis. The research is based on the synergetic paradigm, the theory of shared intentionality as well as the concept of hidden influence on the processes of socialization, synchronization of social influence on moral decisions, benefits of the cooperative learning, interpretation of social expectations as epistemological norms and standards, and the concept of social support. Originality. Social expectations are considered in a synergistic relationship to their anthropological and axiological nature. The anthropological dimension of social expectations based on human nature as a mortal and rational being is outlined. The paper highlights the axiological dimension of social expectations on the ground of the need for socialization and imitation of systems of material and spiritual values in the group. The concept of stereotype and the thanatology of social expectations is substantiated. It is proved that the stereotype of social expectations is dependent on its axiological dimension, and the thanatology of social expectations is dependent on its anthropological dimension, which is based on human mortality. It has been studied out that the stereotypical and thanatological nature of social expectations significantly influences the processes of social self-organization. Conclusions. The social expectations of a person are oriented mainly toward the anthropological dimension of values since by nature a human is a mortal being. Human social expectations are mainly related to life, health, and safety showing the priority of the thanatological nature of social expectations and their futuristic content. Social expectations are also oriented towards social values. The latter is related to the collective rational nature of a person who is prone to social imitation, which affects the stereotypical nature of social expectations. Any social expectation is an axiological one. It is an expectation of material and spiritual values. The axiological dimension of social expectations has a stereotypical nature since it is linked to the specificity of collective socialization and coexistence. The anthropological dimension of social expectations has a thanatological character and is based on human nature as a mortal and at the same time rational being forming own rationality in the group. The concept of stereotypical and thanatological social expectations is promising for further scientific exploration as its methodological basis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15802/ampr.v0i18.221379

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Budz, V. (2017). Prolegomena to Self-Organization of Social Being. Conceptual and Methodological Bases of Research. In Self-Organisation of Public Reality in the Context of its Anthropological Principles and Axiological Factors: In 5 vols.: Monograph (Vol. 1). Ivano-Frankivsk: Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. (in Ukrainian)

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hoian, I. M., & Budz, V. P.
Affiliations
  • Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University (UA)
  • Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine
Corresponding author
Hoian, I. M.
Venue
Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
Published
2020-12-27
Issue
18
Pages
76-86
ISSN
  • 2227-7242 (ISSN-L)
  • 2304-9685
OpenAlex
W3114232566
Cited by
7
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Keywords
social expectations, social self-organization, anthropological dimension, axiological dimension, thanatology, socialization, imitation, shared intentionality, synergetics, social support, ethical decision-making, human mortality, social values, cooperative learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.