Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 43Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Role of Attachment Styles, Peer Relations, and Affections in Predicting Internet Addiction

Open access
Savcı, Mustafa, Aysan, Ferda·2016·Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions

Abstract

The role of attachment styles, peer relations and affections in predicting Internet addiction is scrutinized in this study. It has been conducted with a total of 2,440 volunteer adolescents, out of which 1,588 are females and 852 are males, all between 14 and 19 years old and attending various high schools in Elazığ’s city center. In this study, the short form of the young Internet addiction test, the Relationship Scale Questionnaire, the Friendship Qualities Scale, and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used as data collection tools. Collected data were analyzed through correlational, multiple, and stepwise regression analyses. Study findings demonstrate that the independent variables of attachment styles, peer relations, and affections explain approximately 19% of Internet addiction. Furthermore, Internet addiction among adolescents was observed to be predominantly predicted by the variables of negative affection, conflict, and secure attachment. Attachment styles, peer relations, and affections were determined to predict Internet addiction, and the contribution of affections in this prediction is striking. The results are discussed within the framework of the literature, and recommendations have been given for future studies and applications.Citation: Savcı, M., & Aysan, F. (2016). The role of attachment styles, peer relations, and affections in predicting Internet addiction. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 3, 416–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0028

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Savcı, M., & Aysan, F.
Affiliations
Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
Venue
Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions
Published
2016-12-10
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
416-432
ISSN
  • 2148-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2149-1305
OpenAlex
W3010073477
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addicta The Turkish Journal on Addictions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
internet addiction, attachment styles, peer relationships, affection, adolescents, friendship quality, conflict, secure attachment, negative affect, positive affect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Attachment Styles, Peer Relations, and Affections in Predicting Internet Addiction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0028
The paper
Savcı, M., & Aysan, F. (2016). The Role of Attachment Styles, Peer Relations, and Affections in Predicting Internet Addiction. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0028