Genetic susceptibility and resistance to influenza infection and disease in humans and mice
Abstract
Although genetic risk factors for influenza infection have not yet been defined in people, differences in genetic background and related variation in the response to infection, as well as viral virulence, are all likely to influence both the likelihood of infection and disease severity. However, apart from characterization of viral binding sites in avian and mammalian hosts, relatively little investigation has focused on host genetic determinants of susceptibility or resistance to infection, or the severity of the associated disease in humans or other species. Similarly, the role of genetic background in the generation of an efficacious immune response to either infection or vaccination has not been extensively evaluated. However, genetic influences on susceptibility and resistance to numerous infectious agents and on the resultant host inflammatory and immune responses are well established in both humans and other animals. Mouse-adapted strains of human influenza viruses and the use of inbred strains of laboratory mice have supported extensive characterization of the pathogenesis and immunology of influenza virus infections. Like individual humans, inbred strains of mice vary in their reactions to influenza infection, particularly with regard to the inflammatory response and disease severity, supporting the potential use of these mice as a valuable surrogate for human genetic variation. Relying heavily on what we have learned from mice, this overview summarizes existing animal, human and epidemiologic data suggestive of host genetic influences on influenza infection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strain differences in mice responses indicate a genetic component affecting the sleep response to influenza virus.
“There are strain differences in responses of mice to this challenge (Toth and Verhulst, 2003), indicating a genetic component affecting the sleep response to influenza virus (Trammell and Toth, 2008).”
From Sleep health: Reciprocal regulation of sleep and innate immunity (2017) · cites this paper as Trammell and Toth, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 138 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Trammell, R. A., & Toth, L. A.
- Affiliations
- SIU Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 515-529
- ISSN
- 1473-7159 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8352
- OpenAlex
- W2148785619
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 138
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- influenza, host genetic susceptibility, genetic resistance to infection, disease severity, inbred mouse strains, genetic background, host immune response, inflammation, influenza vaccination, viral virulence, avian influenza, human influenza
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Inflammation, Influenza, Human, Mice, Inbred Strains, Influenza A virus, Vaccination, Genetic Variation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review